Feedback

.vscode/launch.json

@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+{
+    // Use IntelliSense to learn about possible attributes.
+    // Hover to view descriptions of existing attributes.
+    // For more information, visit: https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?linkid=830387
+    "version": "0.2.0",
+    "configurations": [
+
+        {
+            "type": "chrome",
+            "request": "launch",
+            "name": "Launch Chrome against localhost",
+            "url": "http://localhost:3000",
+            "webRoot": "${workspaceFolder}"
+        }
+    ]
+}

README.md

@@ -0,0 +1,85 @@
+# Calypso
+
+## Table of Contents
+1. [Overview](#overview)
+2. [Getting Started](#getting-started)
+3. [Development](#development)
+4. [Contributing](#contributing)
+
+## Overview
+Calypso is a platform that allows artists to express their creativity and allows art enthusiasts to explore a diverse range of art. Our platform is designed to accommodate all artforms: digital art, music, animations and much more. 
+
+Calypso empowers users to satisfy their art cravings in a simple way. We provide a single platform for every art form. Users no longer have to have multiple accounts for different types of art, Calypso provides access to it all!
+
+Artists can customise their profile to showcase their pieces and attract potential buyers. Our platform also provides the opportunity for commission requests. Further, our unique analytics dashboard allows you to visualise your sales and performance metrics. 
+
+Anyone can join our platform to discover a wide variety of art created by unique artists. Calypso makes communication with artists easy, granting the opportunity to discuss commissions or customised pieces that are aligned perfectly with your preferences!
+
+Begin your journey into supporting artists, exploring new artforms and showcasing your masterpieces within our vibrant platform, tailored for any artform!
+
+
+## Getting Started 
+
+## Installation
+Pre-requisites:
+- Node.js version 18.16.0
+
+#### 1. Clone the repository
+```
+git clone https://github.com/CSCC012023/final-project-s23-calypso.git
+```
+#### 2. Install packages by running the following commands
+```
+cd client
+npm install 
+cd ../server
+npm install
+```
+#### 3. Run the client
+```
+cd client
+npm start
+```
+#### 4. Run the server
+```
+cd server
+npm start
+```
+#### If there is a nodemon error, please run the following command:
+```
+npm install
+```
+
+## Development 
+- A MERN (Mongodb, Express, React and Node) tech stack was used to develop this project
+
+- Software Architecture Pattern: MVC (model view controller)
+
+- Version Control: Git  
+
+- Jira was used to track product backlog and track and plan our project.
+
+## Contributing 
+To contribute to our project, one can follow the following steps below: 
+
+Clone the repository
+```
+git clone https://github.com/CSCC012023/final-project-s23-calypso.git
+```
+Install packages
+```
+npm install 
+```
+Create branch
+```
+git checkout -b /branchname
+```
+Commit changes
+```
+git commit -m 'commit message describing what you did'
+```
+Push to branch
+```
+git push origin /branchname
+```
+Open a pull request and await for 2 memebers to code check

doc/marking/sprint0-calypso.md

@@ -0,0 +1,257 @@
+# Sprint 0 rubrics
+
+**Team Name:** calypso  
+**Github:** https://github.com/CSCC012023/final-project-s23-calypso
+
+---
+## product.md (Max 36 marks)
+  - Project objectives have been specified clearly (max 2 marks)   
+    - 2 marks = clearly
+    - 1 mark  = somewhat clearly
+    - 0 marks = not at all
+
+    Your mark: 2
+
+  - Key users have been identified clearly (max 2 marks) 
+    - 2 marks = clearly
+    - 1 mark  = somewhat clearly
+    - 0 marks = not at all
+
+    Your mark: 2
+
+  - Scenarios have been described clearly (max 2 marks)    
+    - 2 marks = clearly
+    - 1 mark  = somewhat clearly
+    - 0 marks = not at all
+
+    Your mark: 2
+
+
+  - Market research has been done (max 2 marks)
+    - 2 marks = to a high degree
+    - 1 mark = to an acceptable degree
+    - 0 marks = not at all
+
+    Your mark = 2
+
+  - The idea is feasible and students could realistically finish an MVP during the course of the semester (max 2 marks)
+    - 2 marks = to a high degree
+    - 1 mark = to an acceptable degree
+    - 0 marks = not at all
+
+    Your mark = 2
+
+  - The idea is novel , it shows a level of thought and creativity (max 2 marks)
+    - 2 marks = to a high degree
+    - 1 mark = to an acceptable degree
+    - 0 marks = not at all
+
+    Your mark = 2
+
+  - The idea has business potential (max 2 marks)
+    - 2 marks = to a high degree
+    - 1 mark = to an acceptable degree
+    - 0 marks = not at all
+
+    Your mark = 1 (it does provide convenience but isn’t necessary for users to completely switch over)
+
+
+- Quality of the persona should be measured based on the presence/absence quality of description of the following elements:
+      Age, personality, personal background
+      Skills, professional background
+      Attitude towards technology, domain, etc.
+      Goals when using the system
+      (max 4 marks)
+    - 4 marks = Two or more high quality personas provided
+    - 3 marks = Two personas provided but quality is not very good
+    - 2 marks = Only 1 persona provided with good quality
+    - 1 mark  = One persona of poor quality
+    - 0 marks = No personas provided
+
+	Your mark: 4
+
+- Relevance to the system  (max 2 marks)
+    - 2 marks = Personas are highly relevant to the system 
+    - 1 mark  = Personas are somewhat relevant
+    - 0 marks = Not all or no personas are relevant 
+
+    Your mark: 2
+
+- Persona Descriptions (max 2 marks)
+    - 2 marks = Appropriate length and is well-written
+    - 1 mark  = Short and/or with errors
+    - 0 marks = No writing or poor quality
+
+    Your mark: 2
+
+- Competition has been identified clearly (max 2 marks) 
+    - 2 marks = clearly
+    - 1 mark = somewhat clearly
+    - 0 marks = not at all
+
+     Your mark: 2
+
+- Definition of done is (max 2 marks)
+    - 2 marks = Relevant to the project and applies to all stories
+    - 1 mark  = Somewhat relevant and does not apply to all stories
+    - 0 marks = Missing or unclear
+
+  Your mark: 2
+
+
+- Team organization (roles) divided clearly (max 2 marks)
+    - 2 marks = Team organization (roles) are divided clearly
+    - 1 mark  = Unclear team organization
+    - 0 marks = Not completed
+
+    Your mark: 1 (who is focused on frontend, backend, or fullstack?)
+
+- Decision making (max 2 marks)
+    - 2 marks = decision making is described clearly
+    - 1 mark  = unclear decision making
+    - 0 marks = Not completed
+
+    Your mark: 2
+
+- Prioritizing user stories (max 2 marks)
+    - 2 marks = Clear criteria is used on how user stories are prioritized
+    - 1 mark  = Somewhat clear criteria used
+    - 0 marks = Not completed
+
+    Your mark: 2
+
+- Meetings (max 2 marks)
+    - 2 marks = Meeting plan described clearly
+    - 1 mark  = Description is unclear
+    - 0 marks = Description is missing; Not completed
+
+    Your mark: 2
+
+- Next phase (max 2 marks)
+    - 2 marks = description is clear
+    - 1 mark  = somewhat clear
+    - 0 marks = no description provided
+
+    Your mark: 0 (what do you plan on working on in sprint 1, etc?)
+
+
+  product.md Total Mark: 32 / 36
+
+
+
+
+
+---
+## Product Backlog.md (Max 8 marks) 
+  - Sufficient stories created to occupy team for release 1 (max 2 marks) 
+    - 2 marks = Excellent
+    - 1 mark  = Few user stories, clearly not enough to occupy team for release 1
+    - 0 marks = No user stories
+
+    Your mark: 2
+
+  - Relevant persona clearly identified for each user story (max 2 marks) 
+    - 2 marks = All user stories identify relevant persona
+    - 1 mark  = Part of the stories do not mention persona
+    - 0 marks = No personas mentioned in user stories
+
+    Your mark: 2
+
+  - All user stories identify goal/desire and all identify why/benefit (max 2 marks) 
+    - 2 marks = All user stories identify goals
+    - 1 mark  = Part of the stories do not identify goals
+    - 0 marks = No user story identifies goals
+
+    Your mark: 2
+
+  - Writing (max 2 marks) 
+    - 2 marks = Writing is very clear for all stories
+    - 1 mark  = Writing is not clear for some stories
+    - 0 marks = Writing is poor and with errors
+
+    Your mark: 2
+
+  Product Backlog.md Total Mark: 8 / 8
+
+
+---
+## Setup (max 3 marks)
+
+  - Frontend
+    - 1 mark  = Frontend setup is complete
+    - 0 marks = Frontend is not setup
+
+    Your mark: 1
+
+  - Backend
+    - 1 mark  = Backend setup is complete
+    - 0 marks = Backend is not setup
+
+    Your mark: 1
+
+
+
+ - Database
+    - 1 mark  = Database setup is complete
+    - 0 marks = Database is not setup
+
+    Your mark: 1
+
+  Setup Total Mark: 3 / 3
+
+---
+## Documentation: README.md (max 3 marks)
+  - Motivation and Project Description
+    - 1 mark  = Short detailed description of motivation behind the project and why it exists
+    - 0 marks = Motivation is missing or has grammar errors/typos
+
+    Your mark: 1
+
+  - Installation for your Software/System
+    - 1 mark  = Instructions for installation process are clear and concise, with provided commands.
+    - 0 marks = No instructions or installation section has grammar errors/typos
+
+    Your mark: 1
+
+  - Contribution
+    - 1 mark  = Contribution process is well-explained, allowing contributors to easily get on board
+    - 0 marks = Contribution is missing or has grammar errors/typos
+
+    Your mark: 0.5 (typo “2 memebers to code check”)
+
+  README.md Total Mark: 2.5 / 3
+
+
+---
+## User experience: (max 4 marks)
+  - User experience is logically related to scenarios (from product.md) (max 2 marks)
+    - 2 marks = Relates well
+    - 1 mark  = Somewhat related
+    - 0 marks = Missing or not related
+
+    Your mark: 2
+
+  - Graphic representation is clear and represents well intended user interface elements (max 2 marks)
+    - 2 marks = Clear and well done
+    - 1 mark  = Not very clear, 
+    - 0 marks = missing or completely unclear
+
+    Your mark: 2 
+
+  User experience Total Mark: 4 / 4
+
+---
+## Presentation quality: (max 3 marks)
+- 3 marks = Documentation done very clearly and presented in a very well organized way
+- 2 mark  = presented in somewhat clear way
+- 1 mark  = Not very clear, 
+- 0 marks = missing or completely unclear
+
+ Presentation quality Total Mark: 3 / 3
+
+## Total Mark  
+52.5 / 57
+
+
+
+