Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ci: Run ci checks on all prs #704

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

ci: Run ci checks on all prs #704

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

aborgna-q
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@aborgna-q aborgna-q added the run-ci-checks Special label to force running all checks in CI label Nov 27, 2024
@aborgna-q aborgna-q requested a review from ss2165 November 27, 2024 16:49
@aborgna-q aborgna-q requested a review from a team as a code owner November 27, 2024 16:49
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 27, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 82.76%. Comparing base (e6a27b2) to head (8accda7).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #704   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   82.76%   82.76%           
=======================================
  Files          62       62           
  Lines        7102     7102           
  Branches     6849     6849           
=======================================
  Hits         5878     5878           
  Misses        861      861           
  Partials      363      363           
Flag Coverage Δ
python 82.21% <ø> (ø)
rust 82.78% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@aborgna-q aborgna-q closed this Nov 27, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
run-ci-checks Special label to force running all checks in CI
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant