Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Add lazify-measure pass #482

Merged
merged 15 commits into from
Jul 16, 2024
Merged

feat: Add lazify-measure pass #482

merged 15 commits into from
Jul 16, 2024

Conversation

doug-q
Copy link
Contributor

@doug-q doug-q commented Jul 15, 2024

No description provided.

@doug-q doug-q changed the title DRAFT: lazyify measure feat: Add lazify-measure pass Jul 15, 2024
@doug-q doug-q marked this pull request as ready for review July 15, 2024 13:09
@doug-q doug-q requested a review from a team as a code owner July 15, 2024 13:09
@doug-q doug-q requested a review from cqc-alec July 15, 2024 13:09
@doug-q doug-q force-pushed the doug/lazyify-measure branch from b153357 to 80a12e3 Compare July 15, 2024 13:14

impl MakeOpDef for LazyQuantumOp {
fn signature(&self) -> SignatureFunc {
FunctionType::new(QB_T, vec![QB_T, future_type(BOOL_T)]).into()
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is correct for Measure but I assume (since LazyQuantumOp is an enum) we expect other LazyQuantumOps with different signatures? (I could imagine a multi-measure for example.)

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, I figure we can change this function when and if we add them.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I guess the advantage of using a match statement now (even if it only has one case) is that we'll get a compiler error if we don't update it when we add new ones.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ok, makes sense. I have added the match.

tket2-hseries/src/lazify_measure.rs Show resolved Hide resolved
tket2-hseries/src/lazify_measure.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 15, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 93.39207% with 15 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 81.22%. Comparing base (a83a1af) to head (b7fca27).

Files Patch % Lines
tket2-hseries/src/lazify_measure.rs 94.18% 6 Missing and 4 partials ⚠️
tket2-hseries/src/extension/quantum_lazy.rs 90.90% 2 Missing and 3 partials ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #482      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   81.98%   81.22%   -0.77%     
==========================================
  Files          61       46      -15     
  Lines        6072     5778     -294     
  Branches     5551     5778     +227     
==========================================
- Hits         4978     4693     -285     
+ Misses        833      817      -16     
- Partials      261      268       +7     
Flag Coverage Δ
python ?
rust 81.22% <93.39%> (+0.62%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@doug-q doug-q requested review from mark-koch and cqc-alec and removed request for mark-koch July 15, 2024 15:15
Copy link
Collaborator

@cqc-alec cqc-alec left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@doug-q doug-q added this pull request to the merge queue Jul 16, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit 7f5d90d Jul 16, 2024
16 checks passed
@doug-q doug-q deleted the doug/lazyify-measure branch July 16, 2024 08:16
@hugrbot hugrbot mentioned this pull request Jul 16, 2024
@hugrbot hugrbot mentioned this pull request Aug 1, 2024
github-merge-queue bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 1, 2024
## 🤖 New release
* `tket2`: 0.1.0-alpha.2 -> 0.1.0
* `tket2-hseries`: 0.1.0

<details><summary><i><b>Changelog</b></i></summary><p>

## `tket2`
<blockquote>

##
[0.1.0](tket2-v0.1.0-alpha.2...tket2-v0.1.0)
- 2024-08-01

### Bug Fixes
- Single source of truth for circuit names, and better circuit errors
([#390](#390))
- Support non-DFG circuits
([#391](#391))
- Portmatching not matching const edges
([#444](#444))
- Pattern matcher discriminating on opaqueOp description
([#441](#441))
- `extract_dfg` inserting the output node with an invalid child order
([#442](#442))
- Recompile ecc sets after
[#441](#441)
([#484](#484))

### Documentation
- Update tket2-py readme
([#431](#431))
- Better error reporting in portmatching
([#437](#437))
- Improved multi-threading docs for Badger
([#495](#495))

### New Features
- `Circuit::operations` ([#395](#395))
- tuple unpack rewrite ([#406](#406))
- guppy → pytket conversion
([#407](#407))
- Drop linear bits, improve pytket encoding/decoding
([#420](#420))
- *(py)* Allow using `Tk2Op`s in the builder
([#436](#436))
- Initial support for `TailLoop` as circuit parent
([#417](#417))
- Support tuple unpacking with multiple unpacks
([#470](#470))
- Partial tuple unpack ([#475](#475))
- [**breaking**] Compress binary ECCs using zlib
([#498](#498))
- Add timeout options and stats to Badger
([#496](#496))
- Expose advanced Badger timeout options to tket2-py
([#506](#506))

### Refactor
- [**breaking**] Simplify tket1 conversion errors
([#408](#408))
- Cleanup tket1 serialized op structures
([#419](#419))

### Testing
- Add coverage for Badger split circuit multi-threading
([#505](#505))
</blockquote>

## `tket2-hseries`
<blockquote>

##
[0.1.0](https://github.com/CQCL/tket2/releases/tag/tket2-hseries-v0.1.0)
- 2024-08-01

### New Features
- [**breaking**] init tket2-hseries
([#368](#368))
- *(tket2-hseries)* Add `tket2.futures` Hugr extension
([#471](#471))
- Add lazify-measure pass
([#482](#482))
- add results extensions
([#494](#494))
- *(tket2-hseries)* [**breaking**] Add `HSeriesPass`
([#487](#487))
</blockquote>


</p></details>

---
This PR was generated with
[release-plz](https://github.com/MarcoIeni/release-plz/).

---------

Co-authored-by: Douglas Wilson <[email protected]>
@hugrbot hugrbot mentioned this pull request Aug 1, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Implement "lazify-measures" pass Implement "tket2.quantum.lazy" extension
3 participants