Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Handle legacy condition optype #59

Merged

Conversation

hannah-mcdougall
Copy link
Contributor

add support to prevent failure when getting circuits with legacy Condition optype

@aborgna-q
Copy link
Collaborator

I merged main on your changes, it seems your branch was based on your previous PR's.

Also, you should have push permissions on the repo now so next time you won't need to use a fork.

Copy link
Collaborator

@aborgna-q aborgna-q left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

@hannah-mcdougall hannah-mcdougall added this pull request to the merge queue Jul 24, 2024
Merged via the queue into CQCL:main with commit e4124ca Jul 24, 2024
7 checks passed
@hannah-mcdougall hannah-mcdougall deleted the handle-legacy-condition-optype branch July 24, 2024 09:38
@hugrbot hugrbot mentioned this pull request Jul 24, 2024
github-merge-queue bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 24, 2024
## 🤖 New release
* `tket-json-rs`: 0.5.0 -> 0.5.1

<details><summary><i><b>Changelog</b></i></summary><p>

<blockquote>

## 0.5.1 (2024-07-24)

### Features

- Handle legacy condition optype
([#59](#59))
</blockquote>


</p></details>

---
This PR was generated with
[release-plz](https://github.com/MarcoIeni/release-plz/).
@hugrbot hugrbot mentioned this pull request Aug 5, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants