Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix!: Validate that control-flow outputs have exactly one successor #1144

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
May 31, 2024

Conversation

acl-cqc
Copy link
Contributor

@acl-cqc acl-cqc commented May 31, 2024

This was missed in prior validation, and there are a few instances in our codebase, so fix them.

I also had to comment out a failing merge_bbs test, see #1143

BREAKING CHANGE: BasicBlocks with multiple successors from the same outport will now fail to validate (as they should!)

@acl-cqc acl-cqc requested a review from aborgna-q May 31, 2024 10:47
@acl-cqc acl-cqc requested a review from a team as a code owner May 31, 2024 10:47
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 31, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 86.86%. Comparing base (1032b7a) to head (f24b4a5).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1144      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   86.92%   86.86%   -0.06%     
==========================================
  Files          91       91              
  Lines       18697    18698       +1     
  Branches    18304    18305       +1     
==========================================
- Hits        16252    16242      -10     
- Misses       1596     1606      +10     
- Partials      849      850       +1     
Flag Coverage Δ
rust 86.94% <100.00%> (-0.06%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Collaborator

@aborgna-q aborgna-q left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good catch 👍

@acl-cqc acl-cqc changed the title bugfix! Validate that control-flow outputs have exactly one successor fix! Validate that control-flow outputs have exactly one successor May 31, 2024
@acl-cqc acl-cqc changed the title fix! Validate that control-flow outputs have exactly one successor fix!: Validate that control-flow outputs have exactly one successor May 31, 2024
@acl-cqc acl-cqc added this pull request to the merge queue May 31, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit 0491cbc May 31, 2024
18 of 21 checks passed
@acl-cqc acl-cqc deleted the bugfix/linear_controlflow2 branch May 31, 2024 11:14
@hugrbot hugrbot mentioned this pull request Jun 7, 2024
github-merge-queue bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 7, 2024
## 🤖 New release
* `hugr`: 0.5.0 -> 0.5.1
* `hugr-core`: 0.1.0 -> 0.2.0
* `hugr-passes`: 0.1.0 -> 0.2.0
* `hugr-cli`: 0.1.0 -> 0.1.1

<details><summary><i><b>Changelog</b></i></summary><p>

## `hugr`
<blockquote>

## 0.5.1 (2024-06-07)

### Refactor

- Move binary to hugr-cli
([#1134](#1134))
</blockquote>

## `hugr-core`
<blockquote>

## 0.2.0 (2024-06-07)

### Bug Fixes

- [**breaking**] Validate that control-flow outputs have exactly one
successor ([#1144](#1144))
- Do not require matching extension_reqs when creating a replacement
([#1177](#1177))

### Features

- Add `ConstExternalSymbol` to prelude
([#1123](#1123))
- `HugrView::extract_hugr` to extract regions into owned hugrs.
([#1173](#1173))

### Testing

- Serialisation round trip testing for `OpDef`
([#999](#999))
</blockquote>

## `hugr-passes`
<blockquote>

## 0.2.0 (2024-06-07)

### Features

- Add `ValidationLevel` tooling and apply to `constant_fold_pass`
([#1035](#1035))
</blockquote>

## `hugr-cli`
<blockquote>

## 0.1.1 (2024-06-07)

### Features

- Reexport `clap::Parser` and `clap_verbosity_flag::Level` from hugr_cli
([#1146](#1146))

### Refactor

- Move binary to hugr-cli
([#1134](#1134))
</blockquote>


</p></details>

---
This PR was generated with
[release-plz](https://github.com/MarcoIeni/release-plz/).
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants