chore: Use local ruff and mypy for pre-commit checks

[aborgna-q]

Ensures that the checks run by pre-commit are the same as the ones run in CI, and the ruff and mypy versions are always controlled by pyproject.toml.
Before, we used pre-commit actions with their own versions that needed to be updated separately and tended to get out of date.

drive-by: Fix ruff lints added in the latest version

[qartik]

Would it make sense to instead call pre-commit in the CI? See #66. We do it in pytket-phir

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 90.88%. Comparing base (81f65f7) to head (afc9112).

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #388   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   90.88%   90.88%           
=======================================
  Files          48       48           
  Lines        5340     5340           
=======================================
  Hits         4853     4853           
  Misses        487      487           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[aborgna-q]

pre-commit is an all-in-one check that includes (some) tests as well as linting.

In the CI checks we get to be more granular, and have individual steps for lints as well as multiple steps for testing (with validation, pytket rountrips, coverage, ...).

I think those are different enough targets/envs to merit separate definitions.

[mark-koch]

Looks good, thank you!