Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: correct order of basic block successors #110

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jan 18, 2024

Conversation

doug-q
Copy link
Contributor

@doug-q doug-q commented Jan 18, 2024

This still needs a test

Closes #111

@doug-q doug-q requested a review from mark-koch January 18, 2024 10:43
@doug-q doug-q force-pushed the fix/cfg-inverted-successors branch from 2d8ad06 to 718d54d Compare January 18, 2024 10:44
@doug-q
Copy link
Contributor Author

doug-q commented Jan 18, 2024

@mark-koch I think the errors have degraded, but I'm surely out of my depth. Are you able to take it from here? Don't lose the pytest assertions commit, lets you see the diff of the failing test.

@mark-koch
Copy link
Collaborator

Yes, I'll have a look

@mark-koch mark-koch merged commit a42db7d into main Jan 18, 2024
1 check passed
@mark-koch mark-koch deleted the fix/cfg-inverted-successors branch January 18, 2024 14:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

CFG successors added in wrong order for true/false
2 participants