Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
remove undesired titles from toc
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
  • Loading branch information
AliciaMstt authored Apr 11, 2024
1 parent 10930c9 commit 245a7c4
Showing 1 changed file with 5 additions and 6 deletions.
11 changes: 5 additions & 6 deletions docs/3_Howto_guides_examples/Howto_define_populations.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -54,7 +54,6 @@ This method focuses mostly on discrete populations separated by barriers that ca
###### **Example of geographic boundaries to define populations.** In the Mexican mountain juniper, populations can be defined as a mountain or group of mountains isolated by lowlands below 3,000 meters above sea level. Occurrence data can come from herbaria (purple dots) and citizen science (orange dots). Before assigning an occurrence point to a mountain, it is important to check the taxonomic and georeference data of each occurrence. For instance, the point marked with a white “!” lacks accurate geographic information, and thus could belong to any of the nearby mountains, instead of the location where it appears.
{: .no_toc }

.

### Dispersal buffer

Expand All @@ -67,17 +66,17 @@ When seeds, pollen or spores can disperse the organism's genes, the longest disp

![](Define_pop_Fig2.png)
###### **Example of Dispersal Buffer.** For the *Hyla arborea* populations in Belgium, occurrence points were derived from citizen science data (waarnemingen.be), and polygons were generated based on the reported dispersal range (4 km). These polygons were evaluated by experts in the group, and those where physical barriers affected individual dispersal, as well as polygons derived from a single observation within the period analyzed, were excluded from further analysis.
{: .no_toc }

.

### Ecological or biogeographic proxies

Ecoregions or other biogeographic proxies for ecological or seed zones can be used to delineate populations, especially in widespread or continuously distributed species. Differences in ecological conditions represent a proxy for potential local adaptations across a species’ range. This reflects the fact that genetic exchange is limited across the range; in such cases the use of ecological maps may be the only way to designate populations. In practice, the species’ range map can be overlaid on the map of ecoregions, with modifications as needed to reflect the underlying biology or management of the species.

![](Define_pop_Fig3.png)
###### **Example for Ecological or Biogeographic proxies**. Whitebark pine (*Pinus albicaulis*) has an extensive range across western North America (bright green polygons) that spans multiple ecoregions (other colored and labeled polygons), which are defined by similarities in ecosystems, topography, geology, soils, and climate. For the indicators assessment for whitebark pine, ecoregion polygons were slightly modified to reflect whitebark pine biology (defined by experts) and political delineations (U.S. vs. Canadian jurisdiction).
{: .no_toc }

.

### Traits

Expand All @@ -89,26 +88,26 @@ A genetic (DNA-based) study may be used to demonstrate either (a) no gene flow b

![](Define_pop_Fig4.png)
###### **Example for genetic differences/clades.** Populations of Brown bear (*Ursus arctos*) in Sweden were defined based on genetic clusters recovered in several studies. Both microsatellite and SNP data indicate three genetic clusters that correspond to previously identified areas of brown bear concentration. In the late 1800s the species was pushed back into four separate areas and declined to approximately 100 individuals due to intense hunting. Since being protected in 1927 they have expanded from these areas.
{: .no_toc }

.

### Evolutionary significant units (ESUs)

An ESU is a genetic unit present within a species, defined as a “lineage demonstrating highly restricted gene flow from other such lineages within the higher organizational level (lineage) of the species" (Fraser and Bernatchez 2001). It can consist of a single population or group of them, therefore in some instances the number of ESUs and the number of populations would be the same, but not always. ESUs normally are established using several sources of evidence, including genetic and ecological distinctiveness (Funk et al 2012). ESUs are sometimes reported in scientific papers or management reports, and can be used to define populations. However, keep in mind that ESUs tend to be a higher clustering level, and hence for the genetic monitoring purpose some of them could be splitted.

![](Define_pop_Fig5.png)
###### **Example of Evolutionary Significant Units to define populations**. In *Juniperus blancoi* populations were defined based on ESUs previously described from several lines of evidence. Genetic studies (Mastretta-Yanes et al 2012; Moreno-Letelier et al 2014) found strong population structure based on short DNA sequences. There are also 3 taxonomic varieties (*blancoi, mucronata* and *huehuentensis*) that do not match the former structure. Mastretta-Yanes et al (2012) delimited 5 conservation units (equivalent to ESUs) based on historical, genetic and ecological exchangeability. To define populations for the indicators, the CU of Mastretta-Yanes et al (2012) were used, but subdividing the isolated (> 150 km apart) geographic localities within them, due to genetic evidence of low gene flow. The newly discovered population of Cerro Gordo, Durango for which there is no genetic data was also considered as different population from the rest due to their geographic isolation. The newly discovered population Coscomate for which there is also no genetic data was grouped with El Salto due to its geographic proximity and similar habitat.
{: .no_toc }

.

### Management Units

This category should be avoided if possible, as it may align sometimes more with agency needs or political boundaries, but may be useful and necessary if the other methods cannot be applied, and sometimes it does align with demographic distinction (e.g. no migration, [Palsboll et al., 2007](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2006.09.003)). For managed species, biologists at a management agency may have identified boundaries based on an intuition of adaptation or lack of mating among groups. These units could simply recognize that management takes place at certain spatial scales and some practical boundaries are needed for logistics, for instance within different protected areas (e.g. National Parks) or wild-life enclosures. But notice that if units are surrounded by human-made barriers, like lands converted to agriculture, other methods to define population may also be used.

![](Define_pop_Fig6.png)
###### **Example for Management Units.** The Harbour porpoise (*Phocoena phocoena*) is a highly mobile marine mammal. However, genetic and morphological studies indicate that the individuals in the Baltic Sea are differentiated from individuals in the Belt Sea and North sea. Harbour porpoise is monitored and managed through international cooperation based on identified stocks and different areas of assessment. In Sweden, there is a national action plan for Harbour porpoise that identifies three management units within Swedish waters.
{: .no_toc }

.

## Metapopulations and when locations change over time

Expand Down

0 comments on commit 245a7c4

Please sign in to comment.