ceiling amount contribute #2556
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
1 Skipped Deployment
|
|
You are out of MentatBot reviews. Your usage will refresh December 23 at 08:00 AM. |
WalkthroughThe pull request modifies the Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
Failed to generate code suggestions for PR |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
client/src/ui/components/hyperstructures/HyperstructureResourceChip.tsx (2)
Line range hint
42-54: Consider performance and maintainability improvementsThe component could benefit from several optimizations:
- Memoize the
maxContributableAmountcalculation to prevent unnecessary recalculations- Extract the contribution logic into a custom hook for better reusability
- Add explicit type assertions for numeric operations to prevent potential type coercion issues
Consider refactoring like this:
// Create a custom hook const useContributions = ( resourceId: number, initialContributions: Record<number, number>, onContributionsChange: (contributions: Record<number, number>) => void ) => { const [inputValue, setInputValue] = useState<number>(0); useEffect(() => { const contributionsCopy = { ...initialContributions }; if (inputValue === 0 || isNaN(inputValue)) { delete contributionsCopy[resourceId]; } else { contributionsCopy[resourceId] = inputValue; } onContributionsChange(contributionsCopy); }, [inputValue, resourceId, onContributionsChange]); return { inputValue, setInputValue }; }; // Memoize complex calculations const maxContributableAmount = useMemo(() => { let amount = Math.min(progress.costNeeded! - progress.amount, balance); amount *= progress.costNeeded - progress.amount > balance ? safetyMargin : 1; return Math.ceil(amount); }, [progress.costNeeded, progress.amount, balance, safetyMargin]);
Line range hint
89-102: Enhance user feedback for contribution limitsThe MAX button and input field could provide better feedback about contribution limits and safety margins:
- Consider showing the safety margin in the tooltip when hovering over the MAX button
- Add visual feedback when the input approaches the maximum safe contribution
Consider enhancing the tooltip content:
onMouseEnter={() => { setTooltip({ position: "top", content: ( <> {findResourceById(getIconResourceId(resourceId, false))?.trait as string} ({currencyIntlFormat(balance)}) {production?.consumption_rate !== 0n && ( <div className="text-yellow-400"> Includes 5% safety margin for consumed resources </div> )} </> ), }); }}
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
client/src/ui/components/hyperstructures/HyperstructureResourceChip.tsx(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
client/src/ui/components/hyperstructures/HyperstructureResourceChip.tsx (1)
40-40: Verify the impact of using Math.ceil on contribution limits
Changing from Math.floor to Math.ceil could potentially lead to overcontribution in edge cases, especially when dealing with decimal values. While this allows for slightly higher contributions, it needs careful consideration:
- When combined with the 95% safety margin, rounding up might exceed the intended safety buffer
- For resources with precise balance requirements, ceiling could lead to insufficient remaining balance
Let's analyze the usage of this component and potential edge cases:
✅ Verification successful
Using Math.ceil for maxContributableAmount is safe in this context
The change from Math.floor to Math.ceil is safe because:
- The component already implements a 95% safety margin (
safetyMargin = 0.95) when consumption rate exists and available balance is the limiting factor - The maximum contribution is first calculated as the minimum between remaining cost and balance:
Math.min(progress.costNeeded! - progress.amount, balance) - The safety margin is only applied when balance is the limiting factor:
maxContributableAmount *= progress.costNeeded - progress.amount > balance ? safetyMargin : 1 - Rounding up with
Math.ceilafter these safeguards cannot exceed the safe limits since the value has already been capped
The implementation ensures that even with ceiling rounding:
- When balance-limited: The 95% safety margin prevents overcontribution
- When cost-limited: Rounding up cannot exceed the remaining cost needed
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for other components that might be affected by this change
# Look for related balance checks and safety calculations
# Check for other instances of Math.floor/ceil in relation to contributions
rg -A 3 "Math\.(floor|ceil).*contribution"
# Look for balance validation logic
ast-grep --pattern 'balance < $_ || $_ > balance'
# Search for safety margin implementations
rg -A 3 "safetyMargin.*contribution"
Length of output: 135
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search to understand the context better
# Look for any Math.floor or Math.ceil operations
rg -A 3 "Math\.(floor|ceil)"
# Search for balance-related calculations
rg -A 3 "(balance|amount|contribution)"
# Look for the component usage
rg -l "HyperstructureResourceChip"
# Check the entire file content for better context
fd -t f "HyperstructureResourceChip.tsx" --exec cat {}
Length of output: 76319
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's look for safety margin and contribution-related code in the component
# Search for the full HyperstructureResourceChip component implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'const HyperstructureResourceChip = $$$'
# Look for any balance or contribution validation logic
rg -A 5 "(maxContributableAmount|safetyMargin|contribution.*balance)" client/src/ui/components/hyperstructures/HyperstructureResourceChip.tsx
# Check for any tests related to this component
fd -t f "HyperstructureResourceChip.test" -X cat {}
Length of output: 11813
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes