fix(social): get name from address directly #2444
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
1 Skipped Deployment
|
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@Larkooo has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 22 minutes and 20 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request primarily introduce a new function, Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
You are out of MentatBot reviews. Your usage will refresh December 16 at 08:00 AM. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
client/src/hooks/helpers/useEntities.tsx (1)
280-284: Consider adding error handling for invalid addressesThe function implementation looks good, but consider adding validation for the input address to prevent potential issues with invalid addresses.
const getAddressName = (address: ContractAddress) => { + if (!address) return undefined; + const addressName = getComponentValue(AddressName, getEntityIdFromKeys([BigInt(address)])); return addressName ? shortString.decodeShortString(addressName.name.toString()) : undefined; };client/src/ui/modules/social/PlayerId.tsx (1)
Line range hint
73-81: Consider simplifying playerEntityId computationSince
playerEntityIdis now only used for display purposes and not for name retrieval, consider moving this computation closer to where it's used or making it more lightweight.- const playerEntityId = useMemo(() => { - if (!selectedPlayer) return; - - const playerEntityId = getComponentValue( - Owner, - Array.from(runQuery([HasValue(Owner, { address: selectedPlayer })]))[0], - ); - return playerEntityId?.entity_id; - }, [selectedPlayer]); + const playerEntityId = useMemo(() => { + if (!selectedPlayer) return; + return Array.from(runQuery([HasValue(Owner, { address: selectedPlayer })]))[0]; + }, [selectedPlayer]);
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
client/src/hooks/helpers/useEntities.tsx(2 hunks)client/src/ui/modules/social/PlayerId.tsx(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
client/src/hooks/helpers/useEntities.tsx (1)
302-302: LGTM! Return statement updated correctly
The return statement correctly includes the new getAddressName function while maintaining existing functionality.
client/src/ui/modules/social/PlayerId.tsx (2)
71-71: LGTM! Clean import of new utility
The import of getAddressName is well-placed and follows the existing pattern.
86-87: LGTM! Simplified player name retrieval
The implementation has been improved by directly getting the name from the address, removing unnecessary steps through entity ID. This change aligns with the PR objective and makes the code more maintainable.
Let's verify that this change doesn't break any existing functionality:
✅ Verification successful
LGTM! The change is safe and improves code clarity
The verification shows that the change from using entity ID to directly using address for name retrieval is correct and safe because:
- The
getAddressNamefunction is the preferred method across the codebase for direct player name lookups, as seen in multiple components (Settings, Leaderboard, CoOwners, etc.). - The removed
playerEntityIddependency in the name retrieval is still maintained elsewhere in the component where needed (for ID display and structure queries). - The change aligns with other similar implementations in the codebase that use direct address-based name lookups.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for other usages of playerEntityId in relation to name retrieval
# to ensure we haven't missed any cases that might need similar simplification
# Search for patterns where playerEntityId might be used for name retrieval
rg -A 3 "playerEntityId.*name"
# Search for other potential uses of the old pattern
ast-grep --pattern 'getAddressNameFromEntity($id)'
Length of output: 85
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search to understand the usage patterns
# Search for any references to playerEntityId
rg "playerEntityId"
# Search for getAddressName usage
rg "getAddressName"
# Search for name-related functions in the codebase
ast-grep --pattern 'function $name($_) {
$$$
}'
# Look for the specific file content to understand the context better
cat "client/src/ui/modules/social/PlayerId.tsx"
Length of output: 13082
|
Failed to generate code suggestions for PR |
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Refactor