Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use Standard_LRS instead of Standard_ZRS #567

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 30, 2023

Conversation

debonte
Copy link
Contributor

@debonte debonte commented Aug 29, 2023

Purpose

I was trying to deploy the sample, but it was difficult to find an Azure region that would support text-embedding-ada-002, and had available OpenAI quota in my subscription, and supported the Standard_ZRS storage type. Although ZRS is probably important for production scenarios, using zone redundant storage seems unnecessary for getting started with the sample and unnecessarily limits the user's region options.

Does this introduce a breaking change?

[ ] Yes
[X] No

Pull Request Type

What kind of change does this Pull Request introduce? Change storage type used when deploying via azd up from Standard_ZRS to Standard_LRS.

[X] Bugfix
[ ] Feature
[ ] Code style update (formatting, local variables)
[ ] Refactoring (no functional changes, no api changes)
[ ] Documentation content changes
[ ] Other... Please describe:

How to Test

azd env new [your-new-name]
azd up     (Target the `northcentralus` region which appears to not support `Standard_ZRS`)

Other Information

@pamelafox suggested that using Standard_ZRS for production could be covered in a new FAQ/readme section on productionizing the sample.

Copy link
Collaborator

@pamelafox pamelafox left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great, thanks! I've started a branch with a README section about production-izing.

@pamelafox pamelafox merged commit e48b0d1 into Azure-Samples:main Aug 30, 2023
6 checks passed
HughRunyan pushed a commit to RMI/RMI_chatbot that referenced this pull request Mar 26, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants