-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Block patterns: Remove the block that filters out core blocks from the patterns inserter #52656
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
3083bf6
Remove the block that filters out core blocks from the patterns inserter
ramonjd 7e7fbc4
This commit deregisters all patterns including those added by Gutenberg.
ramonjd e16d3cf
Formatting
ramonjd bff9267
Added a todo to revisit the use of `blockTypes`
ramonjd a28ad67
YODA checks the linter still wants.
ramonjd File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It looks like the
blockTypes
array is used to declare which blocks a pattern is associated with, rather than categorising the pattern itself as core. At the moment, sinceblockTypes
appears to be an experimental feature, using this to target Gutenberg patterns sounds like it should work since they're the only patterns that are using that array. At some point, though, we'll probably want to use this in wpcom patterns so that we can link our patterns with different block types. And plugins might do the same, so could this section unintentionally end up unregistering patterns we don't mean to?This probably doesn't affect anything right now, though, and I can't quite think of another way to target those Gutenberg patterns. So it might not be a blocker... should we add a "todo" item somewhere to revisit it? Or propose in Gutenberg to flag the experimental ones in some way so that they can be more easily excluded?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for flagging this.
It seemed too unruly to add exceptions for
query/*
and other Gutenberg pattern names, especially if WPCOM wishes to add its own too.You bet. Will do.
Both I think sound über reasonable. Great idea. 🙇
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've found a patterns tracking issue. I've asked there whether it's worth creating an issue.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sounds good, thanks for that!