Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Performance: only load editor extensions in the admin context #39422

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Performance: only load editor extensions in the admin context #39422

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
4 changes: 4 additions & 0 deletions projects/plugins/jetpack/changelog/remove-loading-gutenberg-ext-frontend
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
Significance: patch
Type: enhancement

Performance: reduce database calls on the frontend related to block functionality.
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion projects/plugins/jetpack/class.jetpack.php
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -694,14 +694,14 @@ private function __construct() {
*/
require_once JETPACK__PLUGIN_DIR . 'class.jetpack-gutenberg.php';
add_action( 'plugins_loaded', array( 'Jetpack_Gutenberg', 'load_independent_blocks' ) );
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Also, without moving this too you won't really fix #39351. Both of these call the should_load() method that checks the jetpack_blocks_disabled option.

And moving this will likely affect many more blocks. I tried Business Hours and Tiled Gallery, and both broke when moving this line with the other.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@kraftbj kraftbj Sep 19, 2024 •
edited by oskosk
Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks. I think this as a bandaid for moving the module is just worse than moving it. Looking at #39449 as an alternative approach.

add_action( 'plugins_loaded', array( 'Jetpack_Gutenberg', 'load_block_editor_extensions' ), 9 );
/**
* We've switched from enqueue_block_editor_assets to enqueue_block_assets in WP-Admin because the assets with the former are loaded on the main site-editor.php.
*
* With the latter, the assets are now loaded in the SE iframe; the implementation is now faster because Gutenberg doesn't need to inject the assets in the iframe on client-side.
*/
if ( is_admin() ) {
add_action( 'enqueue_block_assets', array( 'Jetpack_Gutenberg', 'enqueue_block_editor_assets' ) );
add_action( 'plugins_loaded', array( 'Jetpack_Gutenberg', 'load_block_editor_extensions' ), 9 );
} else {
add_action( 'enqueue_block_editor_assets', array( 'Jetpack_Gutenberg', 'enqueue_block_editor_assets' ) );
}
Expand Down
Loading