Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove Unncessary starknet + mantle models #204

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jun 18, 2024
Merged

Conversation

Sunny77D
Copy link
Contributor

@Sunny77D Sunny77D commented Jun 18, 2024

📌 References

🎄 Asset Checklist

  • Added to databases.csv or already exists

🧮 Metric Checklist

  • Added new fact tables if necessary
  • Pulled fact table into ez_asset_metrics.sql table
  • Compiles in Github
  • Show Changed Models in Github matches expectations for what metric value should be

@Sunny77D Sunny77D self-assigned this Jun 18, 2024
@Sunny77D Sunny77D requested a review from a team as a code owner June 18, 2024 15:30
@Sunny77D Sunny77D enabled auto-merge June 18, 2024 15:34
@Sunny77D Sunny77D merged commit d041f0c into main Jun 18, 2024
2 checks passed
@Sunny77D Sunny77D deleted the son/update-mantle-starknet branch June 18, 2024 15:34
where starknet_data.date < to_date(sysdate())
{% if is_incremental() %}
and starknet_data.date >= (
select dateadd('day', -5, max(date))
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@Sunny77D In our incremental logic, any particular reason why we do -5 vs. -3 instead of just look at the MAX(DATE)?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants