Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support the usage of com.aerospike/aerospike-client with versions 4.9 and up #70

Draft
wants to merge 9 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

evg-tso
Copy link
Member

@evg-tso evg-tso commented Jan 14, 2024

In this PR:

Changed

  • Enable the usage of com.aerospike/aerospike-client with versions 4.9 and up.
    • Introduce a aerospike-clj.batch-client namespace.
      This namespace extends the aerospike-clj.client namespace with batch operations using the AerospikeBatchOps
      protocol, which is relevant for Java client library versions 6.0.0 and up.
    • Introduce a aerospike-clj.batch-policy namespace.
      This namespace contains functions to create batch policies for the Aerospike Java client library.

Removed

  • Remove :result-code from the get-batch's response.

@evg-tso evg-tso marked this pull request as draft January 14, 2024 13:47
@evg-tso evg-tso force-pushed the separate-batch-ops branch from f4d67e0 to 32a4d67 Compare January 14, 2024 14:39
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 14, 2024

Unit Test Results

0 tests   0 ✔️  0s ⏱️
0 suites  0 💤
0 files    0

Results for commit 2c20d5a.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@evg-tso evg-tso changed the title Separate AerospikeBatchOps into another namespace Support the safe of com.aerospike/aerospike-client with versions 4.9 and up Jan 14, 2024
@evg-tso evg-tso changed the title Support the safe of com.aerospike/aerospike-client with versions 4.9 and up Support the usage of com.aerospike/aerospike-client with versions 4.9 and up Jan 14, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant