Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Docs: Improve type annotations and documentation for utility functions in experiment actions #1452

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 10, 2025

Conversation

drikusroor
Copy link
Contributor

Enhance type annotations and documentation for clarity and usability of utility functions related to experiment actions.

Related to #1428

@drikusroor drikusroor self-assigned this Jan 2, 2025
@drikusroor drikusroor mentioned this pull request Jan 2, 2025
26 tasks
Copy link
Collaborator

@BeritJanssen BeritJanssen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks! I still corrected the definition of continuation_correctness. I guess that variable doesn't have the clearest name... On another branch, I actually moved to clean up the utils function so very rules specific content, such as the randomize_playhead and all the stuff relating to turnpoints, would be moved to those rules files instead. So hopefully that makes defining the utility functions easier, as they are far from generic.

@drikusroor drikusroor merged commit 66c196d into develop Jan 10, 2025
10 checks passed
@drikusroor drikusroor deleted the docs/utils-actions branch January 10, 2025 07:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants