chore: treat warnings as errors #14443
Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request introduces two distinct changes in the backend project. First, a project-wide configuration modification in Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
github-actions
bot
added
solution/studio/designer
mirkoSekulic
changed the title
mirkoSekulic
added
the
skip-manual-testing
![github-actions[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/15368?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
backend/src/Designer/Controllers/UserController.cs (1)
30-30: LGTM! Consider enhancing the documentation.The added XML documentation addresses the compiler warning. While sufficient, consider adding more details about the service's role or responsibilities for better clarity.
Consider enhancing the documentation:
- /// <param name="userService">User service</param> + /// <param name="userService">Service for managing user-related operations and permissions</param>
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
backend/Directory.Build.props(1 hunks)backend/src/Designer/Controllers/UserController.cs(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (6)
- GitHub Check: Run dotnet build and test (macos-latest)
- GitHub Check: Analyze
- GitHub Check: Build environment and run e2e test
- GitHub Check: Run dotnet build and test (windows-latest)
- GitHub Check: Run dotnet build and test (ubuntu-latest)
- GitHub Check: Run integration tests against actual gitea and db
🔇 Additional comments (1)
backend/Directory.Build.props (1)
7-9: LGTM! Important: Verify build status across solution.This change will enforce stricter code quality by treating all compiler warnings as errors. While this is a good practice, it might initially cause build failures if there are existing warnings in the codebase.
Let's verify the potential impact by checking for existing compiler warnings:
✅ Verification successful
Verified: No active compiler warnings found, safe to proceed
The codebase appears to be clean from compiler warnings. The only warning suppressions found are:
- Standard EF Core migration suppressions (auto-generated files)
- One SonarQube rule (not a compiler warning)
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for existing compiler warning suppressions or warning annotations rg -i "CS\d{4}" backend/ rg -i "#pragma warning" backend/Length of output: 2505
Description
@standeren has done a great job fixing all the warnings. We should treat warnings as errors from now on.
Pr only set's the rule for treating warnings as errors and fixes one warning.
Related Issue(s)
Verification
Documentation