fix: remove duplicated action identifier in label #14393
Conversation
github-actions
bot
added
area/process
standeren
added
skip-releasenotes
standeren
force-pushed
the
fix-text-in-actions
branch
from
82c73d0 to
abf1038
Compare
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #14393 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 95.65% 95.65%
=======================================
Files 1877 1877
Lines 24385 24385
Branches 2804 2804
=======================================
Hits 23325 23325
Misses 799 799
Partials 261 261 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
ErlingHauan
added
the
skip-manual-testing
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@ErlingHauan has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 16 minutes and 40 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request involves modifications to the frontend of a process editor application, focusing on changes in language configuration, component rendering, and testing. The primary modifications center around removing specific action name references from various components and test files. These changes affect how actions are labeled, displayed, and tested, with a trend towards more generic action handling across the frontend codebase. Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![github-actions[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/15368?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
frontend/packages/process-editor/src/components/ConfigPanel/ConfigContent/EditActions/EditActions.test.tsx (1)
161-161: LGTM! Consider documenting why renderEditActions is synchronous.The removal of the unnecessary
awaitimproves code clarity. Consider adding a comment explaining thatrenderEditActionsis intentionally synchronous for better maintainability.+ // renderEditActions is synchronous as it only performs DOM rendering renderEditActions();
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
frontend/language/src/nb.json(1 hunks)frontend/packages/process-editor/src/components/ConfigPanel/ConfigContent/EditActions/ActionsEditor/ActionsEditor.test.tsx(0 hunks)frontend/packages/process-editor/src/components/ConfigPanel/ConfigContent/EditActions/ActionsEditor/ActionsEditor.tsx(0 hunks)frontend/packages/process-editor/src/components/ConfigPanel/ConfigContent/EditActions/EditActions.test.tsx(1 hunks)frontend/testing/playwright/pages/ProcessEditorPage/ActionsConfig.ts(1 hunks)frontend/testing/playwright/tests/process-editor/task-actions.spec.ts(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
- frontend/packages/process-editor/src/components/ConfigPanel/ConfigContent/EditActions/ActionsEditor/ActionsEditor.tsx
- frontend/packages/process-editor/src/components/ConfigPanel/ConfigContent/EditActions/ActionsEditor/ActionsEditor.test.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (3)
frontend/testing/playwright/pages/ProcessEditorPage/ActionsConfig.ts (1)
66-73: LGTM! Clean simplification of the editAction method.The removal of the action parameter and simplification of the button text improves code maintainability by removing redundant action identifier information.
frontend/testing/playwright/tests/process-editor/task-actions.spec.ts (1)
63-63: LGTM! Test updated to match the new method signature.The test has been correctly updated to use the simplified
editAction()method without the action parameter.frontend/language/src/nb.json (1)
684-684: LGTM! Language string updated to remove duplicated action identifier.The translation string has been correctly updated to remove
{{actionName}}, which aligns with the PR objective of removing duplicated action identifiers from labels.
|
Small PR, so I tested it as well. Works as intended 😊 |
Description
Remove duplicated action identifier in label.
Today:
In this PR:
Related Issue(s)
Verification
Summary by CodeRabbit
Language Updates
Component Changes
Testing Updates