Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ACS-6190] prefer-promise-reject-errors rule and fixes #9021

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
Oct 25, 2023

Conversation

DenysVuika
Copy link
Contributor

Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements

  • The commit message follows our guidelines
  • Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
  • Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)

What kind of change does this PR introduce? (check one with "x")

  • Bugfix
  • Feature
  • Code style update (formatting, local variables)
  • Refactoring (no functional changes, no api changes)
  • Build related changes
  • Documentation
  • Other... Please describe:

What is the current behaviour? (You can also link to an open issue here)

What is the new behaviour?

  • fix the SonarCloud issues for promise rejections
  • enable corresponding eslint rule to prevent issues in the future

Does this PR introduce a breaking change? (check one with "x")

  • Yes
  • No

If this PR contains a breaking change, please describe the impact and migration path for existing applications: ...

Other information:
https://alfresco.atlassian.net/browse/ACS-6190

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
2.7% 2.7% Duplication

@DenysVuika DenysVuika merged commit 8bd24db into develop Oct 25, 2023
35 checks passed
@DenysVuika DenysVuika deleted the prefer-promise-reject-errors branch October 25, 2023 11:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants