Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

OPSEXP-2298: allow elasticsearch configuration using the same existingResource or values approach #136

Merged
merged 15 commits into from
Oct 23, 2023

Conversation

alxgomz
Copy link
Contributor

@alxgomz alxgomz commented Oct 20, 2023

@alxgomz alxgomz requested review from gionn and slohe1 October 20, 2023 17:55
Comment on lines 85 to 88
| searchIndex.existingConfigMap.keys.url | string | `"ELASTICSEARCH_URL"` | Key within the configmap holding the URL of the elasticsearch service |
| searchIndex.existingConfigMap.name | string | `nil` | Alternatively, provide message broker connection details via an existing configmap |
| searchIndex.existingSecret.keys.password | string | `"ELASTICSEARCH_PASSWORD"` | Key within the secret that holds the elasticsearch password |
| searchIndex.existingSecret.keys.username | string | `"ELASTICSEARCH_USERNAME"` | Key within the secret that holds the elasticsearch username |
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

at this point better have generic keys in the cm/secret to avoid referring to the specific product?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I also renamed searchIndex to search to match naming in other charts (repo & acs)

charts/alfresco-search-enterprise/README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@alxgomz alxgomz requested a review from gionn October 23, 2023 08:31
# -- Valid values are http or https
protocol: null
# -- The username required to access the service, if any
search:
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

maybe a little too generic but ok

@alxgomz alxgomz merged commit 3b0c588 into main Oct 23, 2023
2 checks passed
@alxgomz alxgomz deleted the OPSEXP-2298-es branch October 23, 2023 10:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants