[ACS-6445] Address #PT20471_7 Missing Access Control #3627
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
DenysVuika
approved these changes
Feb 1, 2024
nikita-web-ua
force-pushed
the
dev-mmaliarchuk/ACS-6445-Missing-access-control-for-admin-user
branch
from
5bcfd4d to
2ce0092
Compare
|
MichalKinas
approved these changes
Feb 5, 2024
nikita-web-ua
deleted the
dev-mmaliarchuk/ACS-6445-Missing-access-control-for-admin-user
branch
datguychen
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 5, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements
What kind of change does this PR introduce? (check one with "x")
What is the current behaviour? (You can also link to an open issue here)
https://alfresco.atlassian.net/browse/ACS-6445
When a user is a member of the ALFRESCO_ADMINISTRATOR group and has consumer access to the site, user is not able to modify the site from the ACA UI, while from the API it is possible. The problem here is how the UI is handling the conflict between a users explicitly declared permissions and the overriding ALFRESCO_ADMINISTRATOR group permission
What is the new behaviour?
Admin user is able to edit the site from the UI no matter what access type he has. Changes made to align UI along with the API as the alfresco admin group (ALFRESCO_ADMINISTRATOR) permission will override any permissions explicitly set
Does this PR introduce a breaking change? (check one with "x")
If this PR contains a breaking change, please describe the impact and migration path for existing applications: ...
Other information: