Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

New YiCAT updates #3345

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Sep 25, 2023
Merged

New YiCAT updates #3345

merged 8 commits into from
Sep 25, 2023

Conversation

Cilla-luodan
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

Cilla-luodan
Cilla-luodan commented Sep 22, 2023
View reviewed changes
en-US/dita/RTC-NG/API/api_irtcengine_isfeatureavailableondevice.dita Outdated
</section>
<section id="scenario">
<title>Applicable scenarios</title>
<p>Before using advanced features, you can check whether the current device supports these features based on the call results. This helps to avoid performance degradation or unavailable features when enabling advanced features on low-end devices. Based on the return value of this method, you can decide whether to display or enable the corresponding feature button, or notify the user when the device's capabilities are insufficient. .</p>
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

call results 改成 return values 会不会更准确？

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

后面俩句号

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

感觉不如 call result
写 return value 得写全 the return value of this method. 不够简介

@Cilla-luodan Cilla-luodan merged commit d7ae1a4 into master Sep 25, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@Nero-Hu Nero-Hu Nero-Hu left review comments

@jinyuagora jinyuagora jinyuagora left review comments

@Suri539 Suri539 Suri539 left review comments

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
4 participants
@Cilla-luodan @Suri539 @jinyuagora @Nero-Hu