-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 41
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Non-binary incidence #127
Non-binary incidence #127
Conversation
* Allow non-binary incidence * style * update tests to pass * add some progress indication * tidy up validation script, use histogram for a histogram * fix render and some typos
@@ -234,3 +234,5 @@ Release Notes | |||
* v0.3.4 - add survey weighting use case | |||
* v0.3.5 - add Python 3.5+ support | |||
* v0.4 - transfer to ActivitySim.org | |||
* v0.4.1 - package updates | |||
* v0.4.2 - validation script in Python |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
* v0.4.2 - validation script in Python | |
* v0.4.2 - allow non-binary incidences and updates to fix validation notebook |
Are there documentation update to go with this? It would be helpful to have some of the documentation in #123 included in the PopulationSim documentation (https://github.com/ActivitySim/populationsim/tree/gh-pages/_sources) |
@lmz - I'm not sure what documentation updates would be relevant? I've been through the docs and I can't really see anywhere where there is any real discussion of the nature of the incidence and the previous requirement that it be binary.... If you can point me to a particular section that would be appropriate I'm happy to update though. |
@jamiecook - we plan to get to this soon...we're thinking about how the documentation may want to include stuff like this |
Currently, we do not explain the mathematical details of the algorithm in the wiki, but we cite the TRB paper which describes the mathematical equations in detail. This PR would fix a mismatch between mathematical specification and implementation. |
@binnympaul - yeah i was confused as to why documentation was mentioned as this just brings the implementation in line with the existing documentation. |
I'm pulling this so the code is up-to-date with the paper. I created #128 for us to add documentation to the user's guide to describe the algorithms/methods. |
Hey @bstabler, we were looking to do some work using PopSim and noticed that the non-binary incidence hadn't made its way into a release. So I generated the PR :)