Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve test coverage for convert in MemberAutoDataBaseAttribute #155

Conversation

piotrzajac
Copy link
Collaborator

Improve test coverage for convert in MemberAutoDataBaseAttribute

@piotrzajac piotrzajac merged commit 02dbb5a into master Oct 4, 2024
7 checks passed
@piotrzajac piotrzajac deleted the fix/improve-testability-covering-positive-convert-scenario branch October 4, 2024 14:03
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Oct 4, 2024

⚠️ Please install the 'codecov app svg image' to ensure uploads and comments are reliably processed by Codecov.

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (879d73d) to head (294a6e7).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           master      #155      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage   99.52%   100.00%   +0.47%     
===========================================
  Files          39        39              
  Lines         424       424              
  Branches       55        55              
===========================================
+ Hits          422       424       +2     
+ Misses          1         0       -1     
+ Partials        1         0       -1     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 99.76% <ø> (+0.47%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants