Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update unit test docs #1690

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Jan 6, 2025
Merged

Conversation

zingale
Copy link
Member

@zingale zingale commented Jan 4, 2025

The burn_cell docs were very out of date. This makes them accurate and also
adds a new plot script for looking at the output. It also removes the unused prefix
from the test's parameters and removes an old matplotlibrc file.

@zingale zingale changed the title [WIP] Update unit test docs Update unit test docs Jan 6, 2025
\begin{align*}
\frac{dX_k}{dt} &= \dot{\omega}_k(\rho, X_k, T) \\
\frac{de}{dt} &= f(\rho, X_k, T)
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we want to use epsilon notation now.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

updated

.. note::

Since the energy evolves due to the heat release (or loss)
from reactions, the temperature will change during the burn.
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

maybe we should also mention temperature evolution can be optionally disabled via integrator.call_eos_in_rhs=0 to offer more flexibility for users to explore the difference.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

updated

@zingale zingale merged commit bb3b040 into AMReX-Astro:development Jan 6, 2025
32 checks passed
@zingale zingale deleted the update_unit_test_docs branch January 6, 2025 20:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants