Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

About the training loss #54

Open
huinsysu opened this issue Aug 17, 2018 · 1 comment
Open

About the training loss #54

huinsysu opened this issue Aug 17, 2018 · 1 comment

Comments

@huinsysu
Copy link

Hi, I have trained the resnet50+fpn+cascade model with my own datasets. In my datasets, there are 189 classes and about 12000 samples. I keep the solver.prototxt same as yours and make some small change to the train.prototext. But when I finish the training, my training loss is about 0.15, which I think is too large. And I ran the detection code on some picture and found that the scores for the bbox were too low. I want to ask you what the normal training loss should be and Is it the problem of my learning rate resulting such bad performance?(should I lower it?) Thanks!

@Shadow992
Copy link

Just for future people stumbling over this, have also a look at:

#49

We discussed there a bit, too.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants