You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As it stands now, I believe the frequency of G removal is calculated by rbinom using the frequency of reads with a soft-clipped G in all reads, if the +1 base is a G and there are no soft-clipped bases in a given read. Wouldn't an unencoded G be soft-clipped? I guess I'm just wondering why a read should have no soft-clipped bases to be considered for correction.
Relatedly, I think the frequency used for the binomial deviation should take into account the number of reads with a non-soft-clipped G at +1.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
As it stands now, I believe the frequency of G removal is calculated by rbinom using the frequency of reads with a soft-clipped G in all reads, if the +1 base is a G and there are no soft-clipped bases in a given read. Wouldn't an unencoded G be soft-clipped? I guess I'm just wondering why a read should have no soft-clipped bases to be considered for correction.
Relatedly, I think the frequency used for the binomial deviation should take into account the number of reads with a non-soft-clipped G at +1.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: