sparkling, vague dreams of a future programming language
Glitteral is a speculative new programming language. Right now, the only implementation is the vastly incomplete speculative pre-prototype. It's written in Python 3.4 and makes executables by transpiling Glitteral source code into Rust source code, which is then handed off to rustc.
Dependencies:
Optional dependencies:
- Invoke to use the shortcuts defined in tasks.py.
$ cat demo.gltrl
:= glitteral_is_splendid Truth
:=λ first_plus_square_of_second |a ^int b ^int| → ^int
(+ a (⋅ b b)) # This is a comment!
:= my_list [1 2 3]
(append! my_list 4)
when glitteral_is_splendid—
if (= (first_plus_square_of_second 1 2) 5)—
_:= my_list 0 10
for |i my_list|—
(println i)
$ ./glitteralc demo.gltrl
$ ./demo
10
2
3
4
# comment
'foo' # intern
"foo" # string
# Sequentials
["foo" "bar" "quux"] # list (mutable)
|"foo" "bar" "quux"| # vector (immutable)
# Associatives
{'foo' 1; 'bar' 2; 'quux' 3;} # dictionary (mutable)
<'foo' 1; 'bar' 2; 'quux' 3;> # hashtable (immutable)
# if the second part of a mapping entry isn't present, it defaults to Truth
# it's idiomatic to represent sets as Mappings of one-item entries
# booleans
Truth Falsity
# null
Void
(+ 1 2) # addition
(− 2 1) # subtraction (that's a Unicodepoint 2212 minus sign)
(⋅ 2 3) # multiplication (Unicodepoint 22C5 dot operator)
(÷ 2 3) # division (Unicodepoint 00F7)
# type annotation names?
# [] || {} <> int float str intern bool
# regex literals??
/fooo*/ /barr?/
# anonymous functions
(λ argument-container body)
# Fundamental language constructs (control flow like `if`, `while`,
# and `for`, or definitions like `:=`, `:=λ`, and `let`) are indicated
# by a dash and an indented block (three spaces per indentation),
# whereas function calls are traditional s-expressions. (Thanks to
# Rory O'Kane for syntax suggestions.)
#
# Someday in the distant future, we can imagine supporting macros, and
# having them use the indented-block syntax.
# named function definitions
:=λ name argument-container → return_type_specifier
body
# Both underscores and hyphens are legal in identifier names, but
# _underscores_ are strongly encouraged except where you would
# actually use a hyphen when writing English.
:=λ my_super-great_function |foo ^int bar ^float| → ^float
let |foo_times_two (⋅ 2 foo)
quux_of_bar (quux bar)|—
(÷ foo_times_two quux_of_bar)
# global variable declaration
:= foo 3
# instead of Lisp-like "apply", we have Python-like "positional glitter"—
:= my_numbers |1 2 3|
:=λ add_three_numbers [a ^int b ^int c ^int] → ^int
(+ a b c)
(add_three_numbers *my_numbers) # => 6
# and "associative glitter"—
(my_function_with_kwargs **<'foo' "bar"; 'quux' 2;>)
A portmanteau of glitter and literal, because things that sparkle are OK and one of the things that I like about Clojure (over e.g. Scheme) is how there's a rich "literal" syntax for things like lists and hashtables, which is easier to read than all delimiters being parentheses. Also, I like literacy (and portmanteaus).
The name isn't Google-unique: other things with the same name include an abandoned DeviantArt account, an Instagram user, and a recording by a musical artist called Eagles for Hands. But the world is big enough and short, memorable names are scarce enough that maybe not everything needs to be unique, and no one will mind.