You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hello, why don't you use the average sum of absolute values of the feature map to compute the channel-wise statistic z_c? For example, if one feature map is simplistically represented as [10,-10], then it's weight is 0; if the feature map is [10,10], then it's weight is 10. If we use the sum of absolute values, both feature maps have the same weight of 10. Besides, for two feature maps [-10,10] and [-1,1], which one should be given a higher weight? Thank you for your response!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello, why don't you use the average sum of absolute values of the feature map to compute the channel-wise statistic z_c? For example, if one feature map is simplistically represented as [10,-10], then it's weight is 0; if the feature map is [10,10], then it's weight is 10. If we use the sum of absolute values, both feature maps have the same weight of 10. Besides, for two feature maps [-10,10] and [-1,1], which one should be given a higher weight? Thank you for your response!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: