Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reproduced results #3

Open
pietz opened this issue Apr 28, 2020 · 2 comments
Open

Reproduced results #3

pietz opened this issue Apr 28, 2020 · 2 comments

Comments

@pietz
Copy link

pietz commented Apr 28, 2020

Did you achieve your posted results using the default parameters only varying the scale, training file and eval file? This would be interesting because I believe the results you posted from the paper were based on the imagenet dataset und not the T91 dataset.

Also, why did you use a custom RGB to Y function? Wouldn't a standard grayscale function do the trick?

@chensteven
Copy link

The paper did convert RGB to YCBCR and then use only Y channel. Grayscale would technically be different.

@543877815
Copy link

I think the result is not precise. The Set5 dataset from the download link seems to have a higher (BICUBIC) PSNR than other sources where pictures isRGB instead of y channel only.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants