You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Did you achieve your posted results using the default parameters only varying the scale, training file and eval file? This would be interesting because I believe the results you posted from the paper were based on the imagenet dataset und not the T91 dataset.
Also, why did you use a custom RGB to Y function? Wouldn't a standard grayscale function do the trick?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I think the result is not precise. The Set5 dataset from the download link seems to have a higher (BICUBIC) PSNR than other sources where pictures isRGB instead of y channel only.
Did you achieve your posted results using the default parameters only varying the scale, training file and eval file? This would be interesting because I believe the results you posted from the paper were based on the imagenet dataset und not the T91 dataset.
Also, why did you use a custom RGB to Y function? Wouldn't a standard grayscale function do the trick?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: