Poster Feedback

[jgdenby]

Very cool topic! I think the poster does a good job of presenting the theory and motivating the methodology you picked for investigating your research question. I like the overall lack of text – it makes looking through your poster's argument much more fluid and easy to follow. That being said, I think your introduction and conclusion sections could easily be reduced to some bulleted lists with the main points you wish to communicate. As I read them over again, I see lots of extraneous information that, while interesting and certainly pertinent to your topic, is ultimately useless within the context of your poster's findings and argument. Also, you could stand to include a bit of text-based intuition behind your models, just so someone who isn't as formally-inclined might still grasp what you're trying to accomplish with your models. Finally, it would be nice if you included some discussion of your results as you work through them. Right now, I have to read your conclusion to know exactly what you take away from each of your separate results; if you included a brief comment about each result (e.g., beneath each plot), it would make it easier to follow your argument without having to refer back to the plots as I read the conclusion.