About Outbound AutoScale VPN Attachement CFT

[davidaavilar]

Hi, there.. How are you? I'm using the Oubound-Autoscale-VPN-Attachments CFT. The CFT only ask for TGW-ID, routing table ID and TransitGatewayRouteTablePropagationTag, but is not working for me. I got a lambda error.

• What "TransitGatewayRouteTablePropagationTag" means?
• The NATGW that creates the template is only for vm-series MGMT from Internet, right? If yes, may I delete it? That's because we are going to manage these firewall through Direct Connect connection.
• The ASG map is set to minimum "0" and maximum "2" instances. Could I change this values to min "0" and max "4" instances, for example, without affect the Lambda code or something?
• I have understood that when I created the VPN attachment, it need a Customer Gateway to establish the VPN. Are these resources created by the template? Would the code send the IPSec VPN and BGP configuration to the vm-series? Or do we need to download the VPN configuration template generated by AWS and load manually in the vm-series?

[jharris10]

Thanks for the feedback. I will have a look at your questions and respond in the morning. The Natgw is also used by lambda to reach the AWS API as it runs inside the VPC. You could use the DX link but you need internet access for the AWS API, S3 bucket for bootstrap and for the VPN gateway.

…

On Mon, 9 Sep 2019 at 18:00, davidaavilar ***@***.***> wrote: Hi, there.. How are you? I'm using the Oubound-Autoscale-VPN-Attachments CFT. The CFT only ask for TGW-ID, routing table ID and TransitGatewayRouteTablePropagationTag, but is not working for me. I got a lambda error. [image: image] <https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/33632789/64550697-15721b00-d2f9-11e9-9ee8-544a09267f2d.png> - What "TransitGatewayRouteTablePropagationTag" means? - The NATGW that creates the template is only for vm-series MGMT from Internet, right? If yes, may I delete it? That's because we are going to manage these firewall through Direct Connect connection. - The ASG map is set to minimum "0" and maximum "2" instances. Could I change this values to min "0" and max "4" instances, for example, without affect the Lambda code or something? - I have understood that when I created the VPN attachment, it need a Customer Gateway to establish the VPN. Are these resources created by the template? Would the code send the IPSec VPN and BGP configuration to the vm-series? Or do we need to download the VPN configuration template generated by AWS and load manually in the vm-series? — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#2?email_source=notifications&email_token=AEAEZXDKE37ELVBEMZ4NUHTQIZ6K7A5CNFSM4IU5XHP2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFUVEXG43VMWVGG33NNVSW45C7NFSM4HKHKW4A>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AEAEZXBRHBCR5CYAR7Z4KVDQIZ6K7ANCNFSM4IU5XHPQ> .

[jharris10]

The VPN tunnels are created by the add_eni and confi_fw lambda functions once the ASG desired count is set to 1 or higher.

…

On Mon, 9 Sep 2019 at 18:00, davidaavilar ***@***.***> wrote: Hi, there.. How are you? I'm using the Oubound-Autoscale-VPN-Attachments CFT. The CFT only ask for TGW-ID, routing table ID and TransitGatewayRouteTablePropagationTag, but is not working for me. I got a lambda error. [image: image] <https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/33632789/64550697-15721b00-d2f9-11e9-9ee8-544a09267f2d.png> - What "TransitGatewayRouteTablePropagationTag" means? - The NATGW that creates the template is only for vm-series MGMT from Internet, right? If yes, may I delete it? That's because we are going to manage these firewall through Direct Connect connection. - The ASG map is set to minimum "0" and maximum "2" instances. Could I change this values to min "0" and max "4" instances, for example, without affect the Lambda code or something? - I have understood that when I created the VPN attachment, it need a Customer Gateway to establish the VPN. Are these resources created by the template? Would the code send the IPSec VPN and BGP configuration to the vm-series? Or do we need to download the VPN configuration template generated by AWS and load manually in the vm-series? — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#2?email_source=notifications&email_token=AEAEZXDKE37ELVBEMZ4NUHTQIZ6K7A5CNFSM4IU5XHP2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFUVEXG43VMWVGG33NNVSW45C7NFSM4HKHKW4A>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AEAEZXBRHBCR5CYAR7Z4KVDQIZ6K7ANCNFSM4IU5XHPQ> .

[davidaavilar]

Hi, jharris. Thank you very much for your fast response.

[davidaavilar]

Hi, there. How are you? I have noticed a few issues with lambda functions:

1. I got this error on ConfigFw execution "NameError: name 'tgw_route_table_id' is not defined". This is avoiding the association to the routing table.
2. When I launch the cft, and then I delete it, the resources that lambda functions create, they are not been removed. For example: customer gateway, the vpns, auto-scaling group, launch configuration, etc.. is this a normal behavior?
3. ConfigFw lambda function is creating at least three VPNs. Why? Just one is commited by the code on the firewalls, the remain ones are configured on the firewall but not applied.

I hope to hear about you, soon.

Thank you very much!

[jharris10]

Mail me at [email protected] and we can schedule a zoom. I am not sure where the errors are coming from but I should be able to identify the issue from the cloud trail logs.

…

On Mon, 4 Nov 2019 at 20:41, davidaavilar ***@***.***> wrote: Hi, there. How are you? I have noticed a few issues with lambda functions: 1. I got this error on ConfigFw execution "NameError: name 'tgw_route_table_id' is not defined". This is avoiding the association to the routing table. 2. When I launch the cft, and then I delete it, the resources that lambda functions create, they are not been removed. For example: customer gateway, the vpns, auto-scaling group, launch configuration, etc.. is this a normal behavior? 3. ConfigFw lambda function is creating at least three VPNs. Why? Just one is commited by the code on the firewalls, the remain ones are configured on the firewall but not applied. I hope to hear about you, soon. Thank you very much! — You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#2?email_source=notifications&email_token=AEAEZXEZBP54HO7ZOOMN2EDQSCCG7A5CNFSM4IU5XHP2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOEDAUMZA#issuecomment-549537380>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AEAEZXC6Z6UZPBRQUNMX6R3QSCCG7ANCNFSM4IU5XHPQ> .