Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Suddenly telegram receiver node cannot connect #392

Open
brunialti opened this issue Sep 26, 2024 · 8 comments
Open

Suddenly telegram receiver node cannot connect #392

brunialti opened this issue Sep 26, 2024 · 8 comments

Comments

@brunialti
Copy link

brunialti commented Sep 26, 2024

I had to restore my flows from a previous backup
I have a bot named casa_brunialti
The server config seems to be ok, but the receiver node cannot connect (node status disconnected).
I'm sure the token is ok (i copied from botfather).
The bot name (casa_brunialti or casa_brunialti_bot) does not make any difference
Am I getting too old ?

Node-RED version: v4.0.0
node-red-contrib-telegrambot version: 16.10.0
update mode:polling
polling interval: 300
ip address family: any
all other fields are not filled (except of course bot name e token)

@windkh
Copy link
Owner

windkh commented Sep 27, 2024

@brunialti
can you provide some more details please?
The console output?
Can you send me your flow?

@brunialti
Copy link
Author

brunialti commented Sep 27, 2024 via email

@brunialti
Copy link
Author

immagine

f.json

@windkh
Copy link
Owner

windkh commented Sep 29, 2024

@brunialti why did you check the checkbox "Test Environment"?

@brunialti
Copy link
Author

That was a random temptative, I unchecked the box and nothing changed

@windkh
Copy link
Owner

windkh commented Sep 29, 2024

Did you try another bot token to check if it works at all?

@windkh
Copy link
Owner

windkh commented Sep 29, 2024

Can you update the node and send me the console output of node red?

@brunialti
Copy link
Author

I had to revoke the token in bot-father. With the new token the node worked as usual.
I checked the old token, It was correct. Nevermind. Now it is working
Thank for the support

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants