You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Measuring fine-grained steps in the calibration routine reveal noise from the measurement device and display, which results in a non-monotonic luminance function. The current linear-interpolation method cannot invert this function without dropping the non-monotonic steps (order of magnitude: ~0 steps of 200 measurements, but ~1000 steps of 4000 measurements).
An improved calibration routine should smooth the measurements e.g. by applying a filter or a non-linear statistical model.
Additionally, this model could be useful for measuring the noise itself.
Measuring fine-grained steps in the calibration routine reveal noise from the measurement device and display, which results in a non-monotonic luminance function. The current linear-interpolation method cannot invert this function without dropping the non-monotonic steps (order of magnitude: ~0 steps of 200 measurements, but ~1000 steps of 4000 measurements).
An improved calibration routine should smooth the measurements e.g. by applying a filter or a non-linear statistical model.
Additionally, this model could be useful for measuring the noise itself.
A fast solution could apply a simple filter, e.g. a uniform filter (https://stackoverflow.com/a/73991730) or a Savitzky-Golay filter.
A more advanced solution could be Locally-linear models (LOESS) could be a good start, as they are fast, relatively reliable (https://stackoverflow.com/a/63458548), and available in the
statmodels
package.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: