LGPL instead of AGPL #5
-
Hello, first I want to say thank you for this great project! I am looking for a good implementation to use diesel in a async way for a while now, but unfortunately the current AGPLv3 licence is not an option in my current long term project. There was a remark about reaching out for a more permissive licence. I want to ask for a possibility to use diesel_asnyc with LGPLv3 to be able to link against without useing In my opinion it would be nicer to use this project as dependency and contribute here in case of a sensefull feature instead of do my own implementation. thank you for help! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 1 comment
-
Thanks for reaching out here. That does not mean that I'm fundamentally against changing the license someday. It's just that I do not have the resources to maintain it correctly for a foreseeable future. This could be changed by either:
If you or your company want to support me to actively maintain the Diesel ecosystem please reach out to [email protected]
If you choose to develop your own implementation, please keep in mind that you cannot use this crate as source for inspirations as that would be derived work, which falls under the same license as the crate itself. This likely includes parts of the API as there are few parts in there that are non-trivial. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Thanks for reaching out here.
I'm currently not interested to change the license to something more permissive as this would likely lead to more people using
diesel_async
and I'm not sure if I really can commit that much time on it the next few month. At least I personally do not needdiesel_async
for my projects. It currently exists as a demonstration what is possible.That does not mean that I'm fundamentally against changing the license someday. It's just that I do not have the resources to maintain it correctly for a foreseeable future. This could be changed by either: