You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In case of fully connected mesh nodes like in case of Kubernetes deployed on AWS with Weave-net, broadcast topology updates are redundant as each node could be connected to added/deleted node so it can learn the topology first-hand.
It would be desirable to minimize the broadcast topology updates at least in case of fully connected mesh nodes.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I agree it is redundant; however I can't see an easy way for one node to know it is redundant.
Something like: "all the nodes I am about to broadcast to are already connected to X, so they don't care that I just connected to X" ? But that only reduces half of the noise, I think.
We have discussed IRL a "mode switch" where we tell Mesh we expect a fully-connected topology, and in that mode topology broadcasts can be skipped.
When local peer connects/disconnects to remote peers (handleAddConnection,handleConnectionEstablished,handleDeleteConnection) there is broadcastTopologyUpdate
In case of fully connected mesh nodes like in case of Kubernetes deployed on AWS with Weave-net, broadcast topology updates are redundant as each node could be connected to added/deleted node so it can learn the topology first-hand.
It would be desirable to minimize the broadcast topology updates at least in case of fully connected mesh nodes.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: