You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Les tests qui vérifie la fermeture d'un fd standard avec l'opérateur &-, par exemple 21sh > redirections > inputs > 001-close-stdin, sont marqués comme échoué si le fd est remappé sur /dev/null.
Applications should not use the [n]<&- or [n]>&- operators to execute a utility or application with file descriptor 0 not open for reading or with file descriptor 1 or 2 not open for writing, as this might cause the executed program (or shell built-in) to misbehave. In order not to pass on these file descriptors to an executed utility or application, applications should not just close them but should reopen them on, for example, /dev/null. Some implementations may reopen them automatically, but applications should not rely on this being done.
Un possible fix serait que si le premier call à read retourne 0, alors on suppose que le fd est mappé sur /dev/null.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Les tests qui vérifie la fermeture d'un fd standard avec l'opérateur
&-
, par exemple21sh > redirections > inputs > 001-close-stdin
, sont marqués comme échoué si le fd est remappé sur/dev/null
.Hors la Rationale, et par extension POSIX, ne recommande pas ce comportement.
Cf http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/xrat/V4_xcu_chap02.html, section C.2.7 Redirection:
Un possible fix serait que si le premier call à
read
retourne0
, alors on suppose que le fd est mappé sur/dev/null
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: