Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Terminology jumps away from principle's subject ("Use care when exposing identifying information about devices") #479

Closed
matatk opened this issue Mar 11, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #525
Assignees

Comments

@matatk
Copy link

matatk commented Mar 11, 2024

This relates to #470

@cynthia pointed out that:

Aside from terminology jumping away from principle subject would likely confuse the reader, this looks good.

The issue is that we talk about ensuring that apps are unable to distinguish between user rejection of permission to use a sensor/device, and that sensor/device not being present, which may surprise the reader, as the topic of permissions isn't signposted by the principle's title.

We merged the PR, but wanted to keep track of this issue.

@torgo torgo added this to the 2024-04-01-week milestone Mar 31, 2024
@torgo torgo modified the milestones: 2024-04-01-week, 2024-06-03-week Jun 2, 2024
martinthomson added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 4, 2024
This rewords some of the text from #470 to address a latent concern.

It also switches from "id" to "identifier".

Closes #479.
rhiaro pushed a commit that referenced this issue Dec 4, 2024
* Device access permissions and fingerprinting

This rewords some of the text from #470 to address a latent concern.

It also switches from "id" to "identifier".

Closes #479.

* Broaden the device section to include capabilities

Consider LLM access in much the same way.

Closes #526.

* to

* Update index.bs

Co-authored-by: Jeffrey Yasskin <[email protected]>

---------

Co-authored-by: Daniel Appelquist <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Jeffrey Yasskin <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants