You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Aside from terminology jumping away from principle subject would likely confuse the reader, this looks good.
The issue is that we talk about ensuring that apps are unable to distinguish between user rejection of permission to use a sensor/device, and that sensor/device not being present, which may surprise the reader, as the topic of permissions isn't signposted by the principle's title.
We merged the PR, but wanted to keep track of this issue.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
* Device access permissions and fingerprinting
This rewords some of the text from #470 to address a latent concern.
It also switches from "id" to "identifier".
Closes#479.
* Broaden the device section to include capabilities
Consider LLM access in much the same way.
Closes#526.
* to
* Update index.bs
Co-authored-by: Jeffrey Yasskin <[email protected]>
---------
Co-authored-by: Daniel Appelquist <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Jeffrey Yasskin <[email protected]>
This relates to #470
@cynthia pointed out that:
The issue is that we talk about ensuring that apps are unable to distinguish between user rejection of permission to use a sensor/device, and that sensor/device not being present, which may surprise the reader, as the topic of permissions isn't signposted by the principle's title.
We merged the PR, but wanted to keep track of this issue.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: