Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Privacy: What information may be revealed? #393

Open
danielkhan opened this issue Mar 25, 2020 · 2 comments
Open

Privacy: What information may be revealed? #393

danielkhan opened this issue Mar 25, 2020 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
privacy-needs-resolution Issue the Privacy Group has raised and looks for a response on. workshop-fall-2020
Milestone

Comments

@danielkhan
Copy link
Contributor

see https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-trace-context/2020Feb/0004.html

what information may be revealed in these standardized identifier headers and who will have access to that information?

Risks of tracking across origins/systems and information disclosure are noted in both the privacy and security considerations sections, although in some cases risks are minimized and mitigations are unspecified or discouraged.

@plehegar plehegar added the privacy-tracker Group bringing to attention of Privacy, or tracked by the Privacy Group but not needing response. label Mar 27, 2020
@plehegar
Copy link
Member

plehegar commented Apr 1, 2020

(see #392 (comment) )

@w3cbot w3cbot added privacy-needs-resolution Issue the Privacy Group has raised and looks for a response on. and removed privacy-tracker Group bringing to attention of Privacy, or tracked by the Privacy Group but not needing response. labels Apr 30, 2020
@npdoty
Copy link

npdoty commented May 24, 2020

@mtwo posted these comments on a separate issue, but I'm trying to follow up with the particular issues.

Note that these privacy concerns of the traceparent field are theoretical rather than practical.

We'll remove this

Vendors extremely sensitive to personal information exposure MAY implement selective removal of values corresponding to the unknown keys. Vendors SHOULD NOT mutate the tracestate field, as it defeats the purpose of allowing multiple tracing systems to collaborate.
I agree that the phrasing here is awkward and unclear. We'll rewrite the section.

Vendors should ensure that they include only these response headers when responding to systems that participated in the trace.
As you suggested, we'll replace this with "Vendors should ensure that they include these response headers only when responding to systems that participated in the trace."

“requeest” should be “request”
This has since been fixed.

@npdoty do my responses address your concerns? Let us know and we can continue discussing and create PRs.

I think the suggestions here would be a big help in addressing the concerns about how mitigations are described in the privacy considerations section.

@kalyanaj kalyanaj added this to the 7. level-2 milestone Nov 16, 2021
@kalyanaj kalyanaj self-assigned this Nov 16, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
privacy-needs-resolution Issue the Privacy Group has raised and looks for a response on. workshop-fall-2020
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants