Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

WebCodecs 2024-12-06 > 2025-02-28 #253

Open
1 task
chrisn opened this issue Dec 6, 2024 · 0 comments
Open
1 task

WebCodecs 2024-12-06 > 2025-02-28 #253

chrisn opened this issue Dec 6, 2024 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
LC Working Draft approaching CR. REVIEW REQUESTED

Comments

@chrisn
Copy link
Member

chrisn commented Dec 6, 2024

Name of your specification

WebCodecs

URL of your specification

https://www.w3.org/TR/webcodecs/

Does your specification include an Internationalization Considerations section?

  • My specification includes an Internationalization Considerations section

When does the review need to be finished?

28 Feb 2025

What has changed since any previous review?

This is the first review.

Please point to the results of your own self-review

w3c/webcodecs#850

Where and how should the i18n WG raise issues?

https://github.com/w3c/webcodecs/issues

Pointer to any explainer for the spec

https://github.com/w3c/webcodecs/blob/main/explainer.md

Other comments

No response

@chrisn chrisn added LC Working Draft approaching CR. pending The WG needs to assign a reviewer. REVIEW REQUESTED labels Dec 6, 2024
@aphillips aphillips changed the title WebCodecs 2024-mm-dd > 2024-mm-dd WebCodecs 2024-12-06 > 2025-02-28 Dec 6, 2024
@aphillips aphillips self-assigned this Dec 12, 2024
@aphillips aphillips moved this from Review requested to In review in Internationalization (I18N) Horizontal Review RADAR Dec 12, 2024
@aphillips aphillips removed the pending The WG needs to assign a reviewer. label Dec 12, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
LC Working Draft approaching CR. REVIEW REQUESTED
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants