Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Model] Add support for embedding model GritLM #10816

Open
wants to merge 21 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

pooyadavoodi
Copy link
Contributor

This model is a fork of GritLM/GritLM-7B. The main change in the fork wrt the original repo is the name of the architecture to make vLLM adoption easier.

This model is a fork of GritLM/GritLM-7B. The main change in the fork
wrt the original repo is the name of the architecture to make vLLM
adoption easier.

Signed-off-by: Pooya Davoodi <[email protected]>
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 2, 2024

👋 Hi! Thank you for contributing to the vLLM project.
Just a reminder: PRs would not trigger full CI run by default. Instead, it would only run fastcheck CI which starts running only a small and essential subset of CI tests to quickly catch errors. You can run other CI tests on top of those by going to your fastcheck build on Buildkite UI (linked in the PR checks section) and unblock them. If you do not have permission to unblock, ping simon-mo or khluu to add you in our Buildkite org.

Once the PR is approved and ready to go, your PR reviewer(s) can run CI to test the changes comprehensively before merging.

To run CI, PR reviewers can do one of these:

  • Add ready label to the PR
  • Enable auto-merge.

🚀

@mergify mergify bot added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Dec 2, 2024
vllm/inputs/data.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
vllm/model_executor/models/gritlm.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
vllm/model_executor/models/gritlm.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Member

@DarkLight1337 DarkLight1337 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Otherwise LGTM!

Signed-off-by: Pooya Davoodi <[email protected]>
In case of PP, some layers don't have self_attn attribute

Signed-off-by: Pooya Davoodi <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Pooya Davoodi <[email protected]>
@DarkLight1337 DarkLight1337 enabled auto-merge (squash) December 10, 2024 04:07
@github-actions github-actions bot added the ready ONLY add when PR is ready to merge/full CI is needed label Dec 10, 2024
auto-merge was automatically disabled December 10, 2024 05:12

Head branch was pushed to by a user without write access

@pooyadavoodi
Copy link
Contributor Author

Looks like we have two failures in ToT that are unrelated to this PR:

Signed-off-by: Pooya Davoodi <[email protected]>
And make test prompt shorter

Signed-off-by: Pooya Davoodi <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Pooya Davoodi <[email protected]>
@pooyadavoodi
Copy link
Contributor Author

I ended up adding generation support because some model tests expect it due to GritLM using LLamaForCausalLM.

Signed-off-by: Pooya Davoodi <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Pooya Davoodi <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Pooya Davoodi <[email protected]>
@DarkLight1337
Copy link
Member

You might have to merge from main to fix the CI failures.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation ready ONLY add when PR is ready to merge/full CI is needed
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants