You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We needed to patch capo, so took the 0.8.0 code, applied our fix, rebuilt the container, tagged it 0.8.0-fix and put it into our registry.
On the surface it looks possible to override variables in the cluster_api role to pick up a different tag of the image, but in practice this does not work as the version is strongly coupled to the directory name for the 'provider', and the image tag is also specified directly within the provider data.
It would be nice if there was some more decoupling between the release version of capo, the provider data and the specific image tag being referenced in the provider data, then it would be straightforward to apply a bugfix without editing the ansible role.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We needed to patch capo, so took the 0.8.0 code, applied our fix, rebuilt the container, tagged it 0.8.0-fix and put it into our registry.
On the surface it looks possible to override variables in the cluster_api role to pick up a different tag of the image, but in practice this does not work as the version is strongly coupled to the directory name for the 'provider', and the image tag is also specified directly within the provider data.
It would be nice if there was some more decoupling between the release version of capo, the provider data and the specific image tag being referenced in the provider data, then it would be straightforward to apply a bugfix without editing the ansible role.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: