You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Building the default container images on AlmaLinux would provide a stable base and remain valid for longer periods without needing major rebuilds of the images. Another benefit would be my active involvement in Valkey packaging and position within AlmaLinux should any issues arise.
Thoughts?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@hpatro@roshkhatri Can you look into this a bit and come up with a recommendation. AlmaLinux seems like a good base, but it's not something I know much about.
I think it makes sense to make the default container AlmaLinux 8-based for maximum compatibility. AL8 has the benefit of being compatible enough to run on really old container hosts (which sadly I know exist) and support the full range of x86_64 CPUs. And since AlmaLinux 8 is also available for other major arches, it's relatively easy to offer multi-arch containers for Valkey using it.
I assume switching container bases is considered a "breaking" change, because of the compatibility comments you mentioned. I assume the logical time for us to switch would be in Valkey 8?
Building the default container images on AlmaLinux would provide a stable base and remain valid for longer periods without needing major rebuilds of the images. Another benefit would be my active involvement in Valkey packaging and position within AlmaLinux should any issues arise.
Thoughts?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: