You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It'd be fair to revisit the current subdivision handling approach too. PH had prov and state fields before adopting subdiv as the parameter name. I can't think of a better naming suggestions atm.
Following #1650 approach we should focus on subcodes defined by ISO3166-2, apparently remove deprecated stuff and some supported subdivisions that don't follow ISO3166-2 format (city names instead of their ISO codes).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It'd be fair to revisit the current subdivision handling approach too. PH had
prov
andstate
fields before adoptingsubdiv
as the parameter name. I can't think of a better naming suggestions atm.Following #1650 approach we should focus on subcodes defined by ISO3166-2, apparently remove deprecated stuff and some supported subdivisions that don't follow ISO3166-2 format (city names instead of their ISO codes).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: