-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 129
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Result differences using SATSPLNdll #633
Comments
First point: don't use PR for such a non-ideal system. It is a well-known problem that phase equilibrium calculations are very tricky for such asymmetric systems. Sometimes enabling the saturation splines with |
Thank you very much for your fast reply and for the hint regarding PR. We will no longer use PR for such non-ideal systems in the future. Your suggestion regarding tracing is not feasible for us, as we have integrated the refprop wrapper into a simulation and therefore the gas composition as well as temperatures, pressures, etc. change dynamically. In addition, we often use more than two components. Since we want to avoid receiving output of superheated phase, even though the mixture is in two-phase state under the given conditions, we have temporarily deactivated the SATSPLNDLL in our implementation. |
Unfortunately my suggestion to selectively disable the SATSPLN is about all that I can offer. |
Issue with Phase Calculation Using SATSPLNdll
Description
We have encountered an issue with the SATSPLNdll function in REFPROP. When using this function in the python wrapper, we receive different values compared to when the function is not used. Below is an example where the problem occurs:
Expected Behavior
For this example, a two-phase gas should be calculated.
Actual Behavior
Question
Is there a problem in the calculation of SATSPLNdll?
Thank you for your assistance.
Versions
REFPROP Version: REFPROP 10
Operating System and Version: Windows 10
Access Method: Python wrapper
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: