From 44a4d94a96b57a09e06e14e938e978810a36c1e9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Steven R. Loomis" Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2024 20:21:09 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] CLDR-17416 v45 brs: spec link check (#3634) --- docs/ldml/tr35-general.md | 62 +++++++++++++++---------------- docs/ldml/tr35-messageFormat.md | 8 ++-- docs/ldml/tr35.md | 66 ++++++++++++++++----------------- 3 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 68 deletions(-) diff --git a/docs/ldml/tr35-general.md b/docs/ldml/tr35-general.md index d19ee8989b5..a15ffef2fa8 100644 --- a/docs/ldml/tr35-general.md +++ b/docs/ldml/tr35-general.md @@ -2867,7 +2867,7 @@ The @scope attributes are targeted at messages created by computers, thus a feat Feature that classifies nouns in classes. This is grammatical gender, which may be assigned on the basis of sex in some languages, but may be completely separate in others. Also used to tag elements in CLDR that should agree with a particular gender of an associated noun. -(adapted from: [linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/GenderProperty](http://linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/GenderProperty)) +(adapted from: [linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/GenderProperty](https://web.archive.org/20200115041525/linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/GenderProperty) - the links below go to an archived version. The original site is no longer available, as explained at .) The term "gender" is somewhat of a misnomer, because CLDR treats "gender" as a broad term, equivalent to "noun class". Thus it bundles noun class categories such as gender and animacy into a single identifier, such as "feminine-animate". @@ -2883,13 +2883,13 @@ Thus it bundles noun class categories such as gender and animacy into a single i | Value | Definition | References | | --------- | ---------- | ---------- | -| animate | In an animate/inanimate gender system, gender that denotes human or animate entities. | description adapted from: [wikipedia.org/wiki/Grammatical_gender](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grammatical_gender), [linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/AnimateGender](http://linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/AnimateGender) | -| inanimate | In an animate/inanimate gender system, gender that denotes object or inanimate entities .| adapted from: [wikipedia.org/wiki/Grammatical_gender](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grammatical_gender), [linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/InanimateGender](http://linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/InanimateGender) | -| personal | In an animate/inanimate gender system in some languages, gender that specifies the masculine gender of animate entities. | adapted from: [wikipedia.org/wiki/Grammatical_gender](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grammatical_gender), [linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/HumanGender](http://linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/HumanGender) | +| animate | In an animate/inanimate gender system, gender that denotes human or animate entities. | description adapted from: [wikipedia.org/wiki/Grammatical_gender](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grammatical_gender), [linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/AnimateGender](https://web.archive.org/20200115041525/linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/AnimateGender) | +| inanimate | In an animate/inanimate gender system, gender that denotes object or inanimate entities .| adapted from: [wikipedia.org/wiki/Grammatical_gender](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grammatical_gender), [linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/InanimateGender](https://web.archive.org/20200115041525/linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/InanimateGender) | +| personal | In an animate/inanimate gender system in some languages, gender that specifies the masculine gender of animate entities. | adapted from: [wikipedia.org/wiki/Grammatical_gender](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grammatical_gender), [linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/HumanGender](https://web.archive.org/20200115041525/linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/HumanGender) | | common | In a common/neuter gender system, gender that denotes human entities. | adapted from: [wikipedia.org/wiki/Grammatical_gender](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grammatical_gender) | -| feminine | In a masculine/feminine or in a masculine/feminine/neuter gender system, gender that denotes specifically female persons (or animals) or that is assigned arbitrarily to object. | adapted from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grammatical_gender, [linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/FeminineGender](http://linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/FeminineGender) | -| masculine | In a masculine/feminine or in a masculine/feminine/neuter gender system, gender that denotes specifically male persons (or animals) or that is assigned arbitrarily to object. | adapted from: [wikipedia.org/wiki/Grammatical_gender](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grammatical_gender), [linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/MasculineGender](http://linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/MasculineGender) | -| neuter | In a masculine/feminine/neuter or common/neuter gender system, gender that generally denotes an object. | adapted from: [wikipedia.org/wiki/Grammatical_gender](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grammatical_gender), [linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/NeuterGender](http://linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/NeuterGender) | +| feminine | In a masculine/feminine or in a masculine/feminine/neuter gender system, gender that denotes specifically female persons (or animals) or that is assigned arbitrarily to object. | adapted from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grammatical_gender, [linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/FeminineGender](https://web.archive.org/20200115041525/linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/FeminineGender) | +| masculine | In a masculine/feminine or in a masculine/feminine/neuter gender system, gender that denotes specifically male persons (or animals) or that is assigned arbitrarily to object. | adapted from: [wikipedia.org/wiki/Grammatical_gender](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grammatical_gender), [linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/MasculineGender](https://web.archive.org/20200115041525/linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/MasculineGender) | +| neuter | In a masculine/feminine/neuter or common/neuter gender system, gender that generally denotes an object. | adapted from: [wikipedia.org/wiki/Grammatical_gender](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grammatical_gender), [linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/NeuterGender](https://web.archive.org/20200115041525/linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/NeuterGender) | There are further simplifications in the identifiers. For example, consider a language that has 3 genders, and two levels of animacy, but only for masculine. @@ -2915,7 +2915,7 @@ That is: #### Table: Case -Feature that encodes the syntactic (and sometimes semantic) relationship of a noun with the other constituents of the sentence. (adapted from [linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/CaseProperty](http://linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/CaseProperty)) +Feature that encodes the syntactic (and sometimes semantic) relationship of a noun with the other constituents of the sentence. (adapted from [linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/CaseProperty](https://web.archive.org/20200115041525/linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/CaseProperty)) ##### Example @@ -2928,34 +2928,34 @@ Feature that encodes the syntactic (and sometimes semantic) relationship of a no | Value | Definition | References | | ------------------ | ---------- | ---------- | -| abessive | The abessive case expresses the absence of the referent it marks. It has the meaning of 'without'. | [purl.org/olia/olia.owl#AbessiveCase](https://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#AbessiveCase) [linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/AbessiveCase](http://linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/AbessiveCase)| -| ablative | The ablative case expresses that the referent of the noun it marks is the location from which another referent is moving. It has the meaning 'from'. | [purl.org/olia/olia.owl#AblativeCase](https://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#AblativeCase), [linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/AblativeCase](http://linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/AblativeCase) | -| accusative | Accusative case marks certain syntactic functions, usually direct objects. | [purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Accusative](https://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Accusative), [linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/AccusativeCase](http://linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/AccusativeCase) | -| adessive | The adessive case expresses that the referent of the noun it marks is the location near/at which another referent exists. It has the meaning of 'at' or 'near'. | [purl.org/olia/olia.owl#AdessiveCase](https://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#AdessiveCase), [linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/AdessiveCase](http://linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/AdessiveCase) | -| allative | The allative case expresses motion to or toward the referent of the noun it marks. | [purl.org/olia/olia.owl#AllativeCase](https://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#AllativeCase), [linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/AllativeCase](http://linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/AllativeCase) | +| abessive | The abessive case expresses the absence of the referent it marks. It has the meaning of 'without'. | [purl.org/olia/olia.owl#AbessiveCase](https://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#AbessiveCase) [linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/AbessiveCase](https://web.archive.org/20200115041525/linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/AbessiveCase)| +| ablative | The ablative case expresses that the referent of the noun it marks is the location from which another referent is moving. It has the meaning 'from'. | [purl.org/olia/olia.owl#AblativeCase](https://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#AblativeCase), [linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/AblativeCase](https://web.archive.org/20200115041525/linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/AblativeCase) | +| accusative | Accusative case marks certain syntactic functions, usually direct objects. | [purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Accusative](https://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Accusative), [linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/AccusativeCase](https://web.archive.org/20200115041525/linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/AccusativeCase) | +| adessive | The adessive case expresses that the referent of the noun it marks is the location near/at which another referent exists. It has the meaning of 'at' or 'near'. | [purl.org/olia/olia.owl#AdessiveCase](https://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#AdessiveCase), [linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/AdessiveCase](https://web.archive.org/20200115041525/linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/AdessiveCase) | +| allative | The allative case expresses motion to or toward the referent of the noun it marks. | [purl.org/olia/olia.owl#AllativeCase](https://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#AllativeCase), [linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/AllativeCase](https://web.archive.org/20200115041525/linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/AllativeCase) | | causal | The causal (causal-final, not causative) case expresses that the marked noun is the objective or reason for something. It carries the meaning of 'for the purpose of'. | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Causative#Causal-final_case, http://www.hungarianreference.com/Nouns/%C3%A9rt-causal-final.aspx | -| comitative | Comitative Case expresses accompaniment. It carries the meaning 'with' or 'accompanied by' . | [purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ComitativeCase](https://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ComitativeCase), [linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/ComitativeCase](http://linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/ComitativeCase) | -| dative | Dative case marks indirect objects (for languages in which they are held to exist), or nouns having the role of a recipient (as of things given), a beneficiary of an action, or a possessor of an item. | [purl.org/olia/olia.owl#DativeCase](https://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#DativeCase), [linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/DativeCase](http://linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/DativeCase) | -| delative | The delative case expresses motion downward from the referent of the noun it marks. | [purl.org/olia/olia.owl#DelativeCase](https://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#DelativeCase), [linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/DelativeCase](http://linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/DelativeCase) | -| elative | The elative case expresses that the referent of the noun it marks is the location out of which another referent is moving. It has the meaning 'out of'. | [purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ElativeCase](https://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ElativeCase), [linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/ElativeCase](http://linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/ElativeCase) | -| ergative | In ergative-absolutive languages, the ergative case identifies the subject of a transitive verb. | [purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ErgativeCase](https://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ErgativeCase), [linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/ErgativeCase](http://linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/ErgativeCase) | -| essive | The essive case expresses that the referent of the noun it marks is the location at which another referent exists. | [purl.org/olia/olia.owl#EssiveCase](https://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#EssiveCase), [linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/EssiveCase](http://linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/EssiveCase) | -| genitive | Genitive case signals that the referent of the marked noun is the possessor of the referent of another noun, e.g. "the man's foot". In some languages, genitive case may express an associative relation between the marked noun and another noun. | [purl.org/olia/olia.owl#GenitiveCase](https://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#GenitiveCase), [linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/GenitiveCase](http://linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/GenitiveCase) | -| illative | The illative case expresses that the referent of the noun it marks is the location into which another referent is moving. It has the meaning 'into'. | [purl.org/olia/olia.owl#IllativeCase](https://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#IllativeCase), [linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/IllativeCase](http://linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/IllativeCase) | -| inessive | The inessive case expresses that the referent of the noun it marks is the location within which another referent exists. It has the meaning of 'within' or 'inside'. | [purl.org/olia/olia.owl#InessiveCase](https://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#InessiveCase), [linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/InessiveCase](http://linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/InessiveCase) | -| instrumental | The instrumental case indicates that the referent of the noun it marks is the means of the accomplishment of the action expressed by the clause. | [purl.org/olia/olia.owl#InstrumentalCase](https://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#InstrumentalCase), [linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/InstrumentalCase](http://linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/InstrumentalCase) | -| locative | Case that indicates a final location of action or a time of the action. | [purl.org/olia/olia.owl#LocativeCase](https://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#LocativeCase), [linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/LocativeCase](http://linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/LocativeCase) | +| comitative | Comitative Case expresses accompaniment. It carries the meaning 'with' or 'accompanied by' . | [purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ComitativeCase](https://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ComitativeCase), [linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/ComitativeCase](https://web.archive.org/20200115041525/linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/ComitativeCase) | +| dative | Dative case marks indirect objects (for languages in which they are held to exist), or nouns having the role of a recipient (as of things given), a beneficiary of an action, or a possessor of an item. | [purl.org/olia/olia.owl#DativeCase](https://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#DativeCase), [linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/DativeCase](https://web.archive.org/20200115041525/linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/DativeCase) | +| delative | The delative case expresses motion downward from the referent of the noun it marks. | [purl.org/olia/olia.owl#DelativeCase](https://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#DelativeCase), [linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/DelativeCase](https://web.archive.org/20200115041525/linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/DelativeCase) | +| elative | The elative case expresses that the referent of the noun it marks is the location out of which another referent is moving. It has the meaning 'out of'. | [purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ElativeCase](https://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ElativeCase), [linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/ElativeCase](https://web.archive.org/20200115041525/linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/ElativeCase) | +| ergative | In ergative-absolutive languages, the ergative case identifies the subject of a transitive verb. | [purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ErgativeCase](https://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ErgativeCase), [linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/ErgativeCase](https://web.archive.org/20200115041525/linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/ErgativeCase) | +| essive | The essive case expresses that the referent of the noun it marks is the location at which another referent exists. | [purl.org/olia/olia.owl#EssiveCase](https://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#EssiveCase), [linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/EssiveCase](https://web.archive.org/20200115041525/linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/EssiveCase) | +| genitive | Genitive case signals that the referent of the marked noun is the possessor of the referent of another noun, e.g. "the man's foot". In some languages, genitive case may express an associative relation between the marked noun and another noun. | [purl.org/olia/olia.owl#GenitiveCase](https://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#GenitiveCase), [linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/GenitiveCase](https://web.archive.org/20200115041525/linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/GenitiveCase) | +| illative | The illative case expresses that the referent of the noun it marks is the location into which another referent is moving. It has the meaning 'into'. | [purl.org/olia/olia.owl#IllativeCase](https://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#IllativeCase), [linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/IllativeCase](https://web.archive.org/20200115041525/linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/IllativeCase) | +| inessive | The inessive case expresses that the referent of the noun it marks is the location within which another referent exists. It has the meaning of 'within' or 'inside'. | [purl.org/olia/olia.owl#InessiveCase](https://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#InessiveCase), [linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/InessiveCase](https://web.archive.org/20200115041525/linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/InessiveCase) | +| instrumental | The instrumental case indicates that the referent of the noun it marks is the means of the accomplishment of the action expressed by the clause. | [purl.org/olia/olia.owl#InstrumentalCase](https://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#InstrumentalCase), [linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/InstrumentalCase](https://web.archive.org/20200115041525/linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/InstrumentalCase) | +| locative | Case that indicates a final location of action or a time of the action. | [purl.org/olia/olia.owl#LocativeCase](https://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#LocativeCase), [linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/LocativeCase](https://web.archive.org/20200115041525/linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/LocativeCase) | | locativecopulative | Copulative Case marker that indicates a location. | TBD Add reference, example | -| nominative | In nominative-accusative languages, nominative case marks clausal subjects and is applied to nouns in isolation | [purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Nominative](https://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Nominative), [linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/NominativeCase](http://linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/NominativeCase) | +| nominative | In nominative-accusative languages, nominative case marks clausal subjects and is applied to nouns in isolation | [purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Nominative](https://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#Nominative), [linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/NominativeCase](https://web.archive.org/20200115041525/linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/NominativeCase) | | oblique | Case that is used when a noun is the object of a verb or a proposition, except for nominative and vocative case. | [purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ObliqueCase](https://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#ObliqueCase) | -| partitive | The partitive case is a grammatical case which denotes 'partialness', 'without result', or 'without specific identity'. | [purl.org/olia/olia.owl#PartitiveCase](https://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#PartitiveCase), [linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/PartitiveCase](http://linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/PartitiveCase) | +| partitive | The partitive case is a grammatical case which denotes 'partialness', 'without result', or 'without specific identity'. | [purl.org/olia/olia.owl#PartitiveCase](https://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#PartitiveCase), [linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/PartitiveCase](https://web.archive.org/20200115041525/linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/PartitiveCase) | | prepositional | Prepositional case refers to case marking that only occurs in combination with prepositions. | [purl.org/olia/olia.owl#PrepositionalCase](https://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#PrepositionalCase) | | sociative | Case related to the person in whose company the action is carried out, or to any belongings of people which take part in the action. | [purl.org/olia/olia.owl#SociativeCase](https://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#SociativeCase) | -| sublative | The sublative case expresses that the referent of the noun it marks is the location under which another referent is moving toward. It has the meaning 'towards the underneath of'. | [purl.org/olia/olia.owl#SublativeCase](https://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#SublativeCase), [linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/SublativeCase](http://linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/SublativeCase) | -| superessive | The superessive case expresses that the referent of the noun it marks is the location on which another referent exists. It has the meaning of 'on' or 'upon'. | [purl.org/olia/olia.owl#SuperessiveCase](https://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#SuperessiveCase), [linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/SuperessiveCase](http://linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/SuperessiveCase) | -| terminative | The terminative case expresses the motion of something into but not further than (ie, not through) the referent of the noun it marks. It has the meaning 'into but not through'. | [purl.org/olia/olia.owl#TerminativeCase](https://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#TerminativeCase), [linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/TerminativeCase](http://linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/TerminativeCase) | -| translative | The translative case expresses that the referent of the noun that it marks is the result of a process of change. It has the meaning of 'becoming' or 'changing into'. | [purl.org/olia/olia.owl#TranslativeCase](https://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#TranslativeCase), [linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/TranslativeCase](http://linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/TranslativeCase) | -| vocative | Vocative case marks a noun whose referent is being addressed. | [purl.org/olia/olia.owl#VocativeCase](https://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#VocativeCase), [linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/VocativeCase](http://linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/VocativeCase) | +| sublative | The sublative case expresses that the referent of the noun it marks is the location under which another referent is moving toward. It has the meaning 'towards the underneath of'. | [purl.org/olia/olia.owl#SublativeCase](https://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#SublativeCase), [linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/SublativeCase](https://web.archive.org/20200115041525/linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/SublativeCase) | +| superessive | The superessive case expresses that the referent of the noun it marks is the location on which another referent exists. It has the meaning of 'on' or 'upon'. | [purl.org/olia/olia.owl#SuperessiveCase](https://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#SuperessiveCase), [linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/SuperessiveCase](https://web.archive.org/20200115041525/linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/SuperessiveCase) | +| terminative | The terminative case expresses the motion of something into but not further than (ie, not through) the referent of the noun it marks. It has the meaning 'into but not through'. | [purl.org/olia/olia.owl#TerminativeCase](https://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#TerminativeCase), [linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/TerminativeCase](https://web.archive.org/20200115041525/linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/TerminativeCase) | +| translative | The translative case expresses that the referent of the noun that it marks is the result of a process of change. It has the meaning of 'becoming' or 'changing into'. | [purl.org/olia/olia.owl#TranslativeCase](https://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#TranslativeCase), [linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/TranslativeCase](https://web.archive.org/20200115041525/linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/TranslativeCase) | +| vocative | Vocative case marks a noun whose referent is being addressed. | [purl.org/olia/olia.owl#VocativeCase](https://purl.org/olia/olia.owl#VocativeCase), [linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/VocativeCase](https://web.archive.org/20200115041525/linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/VocativeCase) | ### Definiteness diff --git a/docs/ldml/tr35-messageFormat.md b/docs/ldml/tr35-messageFormat.md index 3938df5b332..01c873407ce 100644 --- a/docs/ldml/tr35-messageFormat.md +++ b/docs/ldml/tr35-messageFormat.md @@ -309,7 +309,7 @@ The design goals of the syntax specification are as follows: 1. The syntax should leverage the familiarity with ICU MessageFormat 1.0 in order to lower the barrier to entry and increase the chance of adoption. At the same time, - the syntax should fix the [pain points of ICU MessageFormat 1.0](../docs/why_mf_next.md). + the syntax should fix the [pain points of ICU MessageFormat 1.0](https://github.com/unicode-org/message-format-wg/blob/main/docs/why_mf_next.md). - _Non-Goal_: Be backwards-compatible with the ICU MessageFormat 1.0 syntax. @@ -370,7 +370,7 @@ variables that modify _external variables_. This part of the MessageFormat specification defines the syntax for a _message_, along with the concepts and terminology needed when processing a _message_ -during the [formatting](./formatting.md) of a _message_ at runtime. +during the [formatting](#formatting) of a _message_ at runtime. The complete formal syntax of a _message_ is described by the [ABNF](#complete-abnf). @@ -500,7 +500,7 @@ external input value does not appear in a previous _declaration_. > 0 {{The selector can apply a different annotation to {$var} for the purposes of selection}} > * {{A placeholder in a pattern can apply a different annotation to {$var :number maximumFractionDigits=3}}} > ``` -> (See the [Errors](./errors.md) section for examples of invalid messages) +> (See the [Errors](#errors) section for examples of invalid messages) ##### Reserved Statements @@ -831,7 +831,7 @@ whether an _operand_ is required, what form the values of an _operand_ can take, what _options_ and _option_ values are valid, and what outputs might result. -See [function registry](./registry.md) for more information. +See [function registry](#function-registry) for more information. A _function_ starts with a prefix sigil `:` followed by an _identifier_. The _identifier_ MAY be followed by one or more _options_. diff --git a/docs/ldml/tr35.md b/docs/ldml/tr35.md index c6065047f27..22fe5cc17cd 100644 --- a/docs/ldml/tr35.md +++ b/docs/ldml/tr35.md @@ -709,10 +709,10 @@ See also _[Unknown or Invalid Identifiers](#Unknown_or_Invalid_Identifiers)_. ### Special Script Codes Certain valid script code require special handling. These are the codes in [Script Codes](https://www.unicode.org/iso15924/iso15924-codes.html) with the words "variant" or "alias" within parentheses, -excluding Zsye. -The Compound codes include characters in multiple scripts; -the Visual variants are distinct in appearance, but otherwise encompass a single script; -and the Subsets exclude certain characters from a script. +excluding Zsye. +The Compound codes include characters in multiple scripts; +the Visual variants are distinct in appearance, but otherwise encompass a single script; +and the Subsets exclude certain characters from a script. The Equivalents for Subsets are not as well defined, so the "Equivalents" are marked as approximate. | Group | Script | Equivalent | @@ -732,9 +732,9 @@ The Equivalents for Subsets are not as well defined, so the "Equivalents" are ma | | Hans | ≃ Hani - Traditional-only | | | Hant | ≃ Hani - Simplified-only | -The special codes most frequently used are in the locale identifiers zh-Hans, zh-Hant, ja-Jpan, and ko-Kore. -These are used, for example, in [Likely Subtags](#Likely_Subtags) in LDML. -Some of the special codes are used in other specifications, +The special codes most frequently used are in the locale identifiers zh-Hans, zh-Hant, ja-Jpan, and ko-Kore. +These are used, for example, in [Likely Subtags](#Likely_Subtags) in LDML. +Some of the special codes are used in other specifications, such as in [Mixed_Script_Detection](https://unicode.org/reports/tr39/#Mixed_Script_Detection). @@ -2248,7 +2248,7 @@ This operation is performed in the following way. Language tag replacements may have multiple parts, such as "sh" ➞ "sr_Latn" or "mo" ➞ "ro_MD". In such a case, the original script and/or region are retained if there is one. Thus "sh_Arab_AQ" ➞ "sr_Arab_AQ", not "sr_Latn_AQ". * There are certain exceptions to this: some implementations still use three obsolete language subtags: iw, in, and yi. - The likely subtags data currently supports those implementations by providing elements that handle them, + The likely subtags data currently supports those implementations by providing elements that handle them, with the deprecated code on both sides: `` Such implementations may refrain from replacing those deprecated tags. 3. If the tag is a legacy language tag (marked as “Type: grandfathered” in BCP 47; see `` in the supplemental data), then return it. @@ -2274,7 +2274,7 @@ Signalling an error can be done in various ways, depending on the most consisten 5. "und" One by-product of this algorithm is that an element such as `` would be misleading: the 'fr' can never be replaced by 'en'. -The only subtags that can be replaced are deprecated ones, empty, und, Zzzz, and ZZ. +The only subtags that can be replaced are deprecated ones, empty, und, Zzzz, and ZZ. The lookup can be optimized. For example, if any of the tags in Step 2 are the same as previous ones in that list, they do not need to be tested. @@ -2995,9 +2995,9 @@ The following are additional well-formedness and validity constraints: 1. [ wfc: Ranges (**X**-**Y**) are only well-formed in the case that elements **X** and **Y** resolve to single code points. That is, **\[a-b\]** and **\[\{a\}-\{b\}\]** are well-formed because single-codepoint-strings are equivalent to that code point, while **\[a-{bz}\]** and **\[\{ax\}-\{bz\}\]** are ill-formed. ] 2. [ vc: Property names and values are restricted to those supported by the implementation, and have additional constraints imposed by [[UAX44](https://www.unicode.org/reports/tr41/#UAX44)]. ] -Note also that: +Note also that: 1. Escapes that use multiple code points are equivalent to their flattened representation, i.e., `\x{61 62}` is equivalent to `\x{61}\x{62}`. These can also occur in strings, so **\[\{\\x\{ 061 62 0063\}\}\]** is equivalent to **\[\{abc\}\]**. -2. If **\[…\]** starts with \[:, then it begins a prop, and must also terminate with :\]. Thus **\[:di:\]** is a valid property expression, **\[di:\]** is a 3 code-point set, and **\[:di\]** raises an error. +2. If **\[…\]** starts with \[:, then it begins a prop, and must also terminate with :\]. Thus **\[:di:\]** is a valid property expression, **\[di:\]** is a 3 code-point set, and **\[:di\]** raises an error. 3. Whitespace is significant when initiating/terminating a POSIX property expression, so **\[ :\]** is syntactically valid and equivalent to **\[\\:\]**. The syntax characters are listed in the table below: @@ -3916,35 +3916,35 @@ The data from supplementalMetadata is (logically) preprocessed as follows. 1. For each rule, count the number of items in each field value set (L, S, R, V) and sum the four counts. If two rules have differing sums, order the rule with the greater sum before the rule with the smaller sum. * For example: - * {V={hepburn,heploc}} is tied with - * {L={en}, R={GB}} (because both have 2 total field value items) and both precede + * {V={hepburn,heploc}} is tied with + * {L={en}, R={GB}} (because both have 2 total field value items) and both precede * {R={CA}} (which has 1). 2. For rule pairs that are not differentiated by the previous step, consider the value set for each field in the order L, then S, then R, then V. - If one rule has a non-empty value set for that field and the other rule does not, - then order the rule with the non-empty value set for that field before the other rule and disregard all later fields. + If one rule has a non-empty value set for that field and the other rule does not, + then order the rule with the non-empty value set for that field before the other rule and disregard all later fields. Otherwise, consider the next field. * For example: - * {L={zh}, S={Hant}, R={CN}} is tied with + * {L={zh}, S={Hant}, R={CN}} is tied with * {L={en}, S={Latn}, R={GB}} (because both have non-empty sets for L, S, and R but not for V), and both precede - * {L={zh}, S={Hans}, V={pinyin}} (because it lacks values for R), - which precedes - * {L={en}, R={GB}, V={scouse}} (because it lacks values for S), - which precedes + * {L={zh}, S={Hans}, V={pinyin}} (because it lacks values for R), + which precedes + * {L={en}, R={GB}, V={scouse}} (because it lacks values for S), + which precedes * {V={fonipa,hepburn,heploc}} (because it lacks values for L), - which is tied with + which is tied with * {V={hepburn,heploc,simple}} (because both have non-empty sets for V but not for L, S, or R). 3. For rule pairs that are not differentiated by the previous step, - consider the value set for each field in the order L, then S, then R, then V as a sequence of subtags. - If those lists for the same field of two rules differ, + consider the value set for each field in the order L, then S, then R, then V as a sequence of subtags. + If those lists for the same field of two rules differ, then consider the first position of difference in the two lists and order the rules by code-point order of the field value at that position and disregard all later fields. Otherwise, consider the next field. * For example: - * {L={ja}, V={hepburn, heploc}} precedes - * {L={zh}, V={1996, pinyin}} + * {L={ja}, V={hepburn, heploc}} precedes + * {L={zh}, V={1996, pinyin}} (because it has a different field value set for L and "ja" precedes "zh" at the first position of difference), - which precedes + which precedes * {L={zh}, V={hepburn, heploc}} (because it has the same field value set for L and a different field value set for V in which "1996" precedes "hepburn" at the first position of difference), which precedes @@ -4097,7 +4097,7 @@ Other contributors to CLDR are listed on the [CLDR Project Page](https://www.uni * Part 1: [Core](tr35.md#Contents) * In [Parent Locales](#Parent_Locales), made substantial changes to the way that parentLocales work, - including a new attribute for algorithmic handling of inheritance + including a new attribute for algorithmic handling of inheritance that avoids needing a long (and fragile) list of language-script codes to skip when falling back to root. That list was retained for migration, but will be withdrawn in the future. @@ -4109,12 +4109,12 @@ Other contributors to CLDR are listed on the [CLDR Project Page](https://www.uni to allow for applications that use them as canonical language subtags. Also removed the substitution for macroregions, and noted that some elements could be NOOPs in customized data, but could be misleading. - * In [EBNF](#ebnf), added more differences from W3C EBNF, + * In [EBNF](#ebnf), added more differences from W3C EBNF, and documented use of wfc: and vc: for wellformedness and validity constraints. Marked clauses with that format where appropriate, and grouped constraints after the relevant EBNF. * Part 3: [Numbers](tr35-numbers.md#Contents) - * In [Supplemental Currency Data](tr35-numbers.md#Supplemental_Currency_Data), for the `currency` element, + * In [Supplemental Currency Data](tr35-numbers.md#Supplemental_Currency_Data), for the `currency` element, added attributes `tz` and `to-tz` to clarify the `from` and `to` dates. * Part 4: [Dates](tr35-dates.md#Contents) @@ -4122,8 +4122,8 @@ Other contributors to CLDR are listed on the [CLDR Project Page](https://www.uni as private use. * Part 6: [Supplemental](tr35-info.md#Contents) - * In [Mixed Units](tr35-info.md#mixed-units), clarified many aspects of mixed units (such as foot-and-inch), - including how to handle rounding and precision. + * In [Mixed Units](tr35-info.md#mixed-units), clarified many aspects of mixed units (such as foot-and-inch), + including how to handle rounding and precision. * In [Testing](tr35-info.md#testing), listed the additional test files. * In [Unit Preferences Overrides](tr35-info.md#Unit_Preferences_Overrides), made substantial changes including handling of edge cases, such as where there is no quantity for a unit, or no preference data for a quantity; @@ -4131,14 +4131,14 @@ Other contributors to CLDR are listed on the [CLDR Project Page](https://www.uni negative unit amounts; the usage of each of the subtags that affect unit preferences, and others. * In [Conversion Data](tr35-info.md#conversion-data), added the `special` attribute for `convertUnit`, used for handling beaufort. - * In [Unit Prefixes](unit-prefixes), added the SI unit prefixes and the power of 10 + * In [Unit Prefixes](tr35-info.md#unit-prefixes), added the SI unit prefixes and the power of 10 (or 2, for binary prefixes) that they represent. * Part 7: [Keyboards](tr35-keyboards.md#Contents) * Added substantial changes from v44 to bring the Keyboard 3.0 specification out of Tech Preview, including: * New sections for Definitions, Notation, and Normalization. * Many clarifications and modifications in other sections. - + * Part 9: [MessageFormat](tr35-messageFormat.md#Contents) * Added the completely new specification for MessageFormat 2.0 (in Tech Preview)