You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Following the update in hash 889254a, associated with PR #1658, the grid_RRFS_AK_3km_ics_FV3GFS_lbcs_FV3GFS_suite_HRRR WE2E test for the SRW App no longer runs. The test fails with the following message:
Range_check Warning:DELP max = 186149.5 min = 44.24700
Range violation on: 2019/ 7/ 1 1:28:40
Warn_K= 36 (i,j)= 1371 527 (lon,lat)=235.094 58.114 DELP =**********
K= 35 7637.79053
K= 37 **********
NOTE from PE 0: ==> Error from range_check: data out of bound
Range_check Warning:TA max = 369.7302 min = 199.1034
Range violation on: 2019/ 7/ 1 1:28:40
Warn_K= 36 (i,j)= 1370 527 (lon,lat)=235.051 58.129 TA = 369.73016
K= 35 199.10344
K= 37 257.54221
NOTE from PE 0: ==> Error from range_check: data out of bound
The out of bound message from the range_check suggests that the issue is a CFL violation. However, the RRFS_AK_3km grid's DT_ATMOS is currently set to 10. Lowering this value doesn't make sense (and values from 3 to 9 were tested and still failed with the same message). Ultimately, @mkavulich found that using larger values for DT_ATMOS allows the test to successfully run. Using a DT_ATMOS value of 30 was decided to move forward. This is weird and doesn't make sense, if this is truly an issue of CFL violation.
To Reproduce:
This issue can be found on Jet and Hera (and probably every other machine as well).
Clone the SRW App - git clone [email protected]:ufs-community/ufs-srweather-app.git
Update Externals.cfg to use hash 889254a for [ufs-weather-model]
A correction to the problem in the CCPP is needed to move forward with updating the ufs-weather-model hash in the SRW App. Please see PR #799 in the SRW App for details on this issue.
Output
Range_check Warning:DELP max = 186149.5 min = 44.24700
Range violation on: 2019/ 7/ 1 1:28:40
Warn_K= 36 (i,j)= 1371 527 (lon,lat)=235.094 58.114 DELP =**********
K= 35 7637.79053
K= 37 **********
NOTE from PE 0: ==> Error from range_check: data out of bound
Range_check Warning:TA max = 369.7302 min = 199.1034
Range violation on: 2019/ 7/ 1 1:28:40
Warn_K= 36 (i,j)= 1370 527 (lon,lat)=235.051 58.129 TA = 369.73016
K= 35 199.10344
K= 37 257.54221
NOTE from PE 0: ==> Error from range_check: data out of bound
Tagging @joeolson42 to see if this behavior is expected following the changes introduced in PR #43 of the ccpp-physics repository.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Description
Following the update in hash 889254a, associated with PR #1658, the
grid_RRFS_AK_3km_ics_FV3GFS_lbcs_FV3GFS_suite_HRRR
WE2E test for the SRW App no longer runs. The test fails with the following message:The out of bound message from the range_check suggests that the issue is a CFL violation. However, the RRFS_AK_3km grid's DT_ATMOS is currently set to 10. Lowering this value doesn't make sense (and values from 3 to 9 were tested and still failed with the same message). Ultimately, @mkavulich found that using larger values for DT_ATMOS allows the test to successfully run. Using a DT_ATMOS value of 30 was decided to move forward. This is weird and doesn't make sense, if this is truly an issue of CFL violation.
To Reproduce:
This issue can be found on Jet and Hera (and probably every other machine as well).
[ufs-weather-model]
./manage_externals/checkout_externals
./devbuild.sh -p=hera
module use $PWD/modulefiles
module load wflow_hera
conda activate regional_workflow
cd tests/WE2E
./run_WE2E_tests.py -t=grid_RRFS_AK_3km_ics_FV3GFS_lbcs_FV3GFS_suite_HRRR -m=hera -a=epic
Additional context
A correction to the problem in the CCPP is needed to move forward with updating the ufs-weather-model hash in the SRW App. Please see PR #799 in the SRW App for details on this issue.
Output
Tagging @joeolson42 to see if this behavior is expected following the changes introduced in PR #43 of the ccpp-physics repository.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: