Replies: 4 comments 2 replies
-
@barlage I was told you might be able to offer some insight here. They also suggested Cenlin He but I don't know their github handle. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
@mkavulich I would also suggest @HelinWei-NOAA since it's his PR that added this. First, to address some of your questions, the motivation for doing this is that we are transitioning to using a submodule for noahmp and that submodule will also contain the model parameters, see e.g., https://github.com/NCAR/noahmp/tree/master/parameters; part of this PR #1777 is a step in that direction. If you are looking for an example, I suggest looking in global-workflow here or here, specifically the changes to |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
@mkavulich This table should not be linked if we are not using NoahMP. Some initializations of NoahMP are still done in GFS_phys_time_vary.fv3.F90. We didn't limit open that table only for NoahMP case. We will fix this issue when we have a chance by moving all NoahMP initializations to noahmpdrv.F90. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Thanks @barlage and @HelinWei-NOAA for your feedback. I will implement a temporary solution in the SRW repo linking the table from the CCPP physics submodule, and will look out for upcoming changes to correct the issues mentioned above. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I am attempting to bring in the latest UFS weather model hash to the UFS SRW application. However, I am getting this error:
etc. etc.
I have a few questions about this:
noahmptable.tbl
, one inufs-weather-model/tests/parm
and the other in the CCPP submodule (ufs-weather-model/FV3/ccpp/physics/physics/
). It seems as if documentation was not added as part of this PR. Is this a file I should be linking from one of those locations at runtime? Why is it treated differently from other fix files?Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions