Mentors will use a y/n/? rubric to provided feedback on some items. Here is the interpretation
| item | interpretation |
|---|---|
| y | definitely yes: any reasonable person would agree that the submitted work meets the criteria |
| n | definitely no: no reasonable person would see even a partial credit worthy attempt at meeting the criteria |
| ? | somewhere in-between. In this case, mentor should make notes, and TA should pay particularly attention to the item when grading |
Mentor: Please edit the link below to point to the team's retro artifact repo
| Item | Response |
|---|---|
| All team members participated in retro and survey | |
| Team recorded retro artifacts as instructed (y/n/?) |
Mentor: If n or ?, explain.
| Item | Response |
|---|---|
| All team members participated in retro and survey | /30 |
| Team recorded retro artifacts as instructed (y/n/?) | /30 |