Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Indeterminate assertions in standard_transition_system #1

Open
zpzigi754 opened this issue Dec 20, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

Indeterminate assertions in standard_transition_system #1

zpzigi754 opened this issue Dec 20, 2022 · 0 comments

Comments

@zpzigi754
Copy link

With the latest uclid (f9a1ef7) , there are a few of indeterminate assertion errors in standard_transition_system.

~/trusted-abstract-platform/TrustedAbstractPlatform/standard_transition_system/proofs$ make integrity-proof
uclid --main integrity_proof ../../../Common/common-types.ucl ./../modules/ap-types.ucl  ./../modules/tap-mod.ucl  ./proof-common.ucl ./integrity-proof.ucl
Successfully parsed 5 and instantiated 1 module(s).
276 assertions passed.
0 assertions failed.
6 assertions indeterminate.
  UNDEF -> v: induction_step [Step #1] property same_tap_r_regs @ ./integrity-proof.ucl, line 162
  UNDEF -> v: induction_step [Step #1] property same_tap_e_proof_op @ ./integrity-proof.ucl, line 161
  UNDEF -> v: induction_step [Step #1] property same_tap_eid @ ./integrity-proof.ucl, line 159
  UNDEF -> v: induction_step [Step #1] property same_tap_r_eid @ ./integrity-proof.ucl, line 158
  UNDEF -> v: induction_step [Step #1] property same_tap_ter @ ./integrity-proof.ucl, line 163
  UNDEF -> v: induction_step [Step #1] property same_tap_r_proof_op @ ./integrity-proof.ucl, line 160
Finished execution for module: integrity_proof.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant